From: Pablo Rodriguez <oinos@gmx.es>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: Are nested sections possible?
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:52:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E67BE5.7030605@gmx.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160311175318.2fbf52d6@cea.fr>
On 03/12/2016 01:53 AM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 09:36:01 +0100 Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> [...]
>> I can hardly imagine the sense in the point you’re making. (Sorry, it
>> must be my fault.)
>
> Think about including source in another source, for example.
>
> Say one has an article that becomes a book, or gets included in a book,
> or the book gets parts. In the course of writing, one might decide to
> add an additional level of structure and not want to change all of the
> \start...\stop structure definitions.
>
> In fact, using fixed section, subsection, subsubsection is a bit
> antiquated, isn't it?
Many thanks for your reply, Alan.
The usual suspect was found guilty: it was my fault not realizing that
fixed sectioning commands are outdated.
Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-14 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-11 8:08 mica
2016-03-11 8:23 ` josephcanedo
2016-03-11 8:36 ` Pablo Rodriguez
2016-03-11 8:43 ` Mica Semrick
2016-03-12 0:53 ` Alan BRASLAU
2016-03-14 8:05 ` Procházka Lukáš Ing.
2016-03-15 16:54 ` Alan BRASLAU
2016-03-15 17:10 ` Thomas A. Schmitz
2016-03-15 19:09 ` Alan BRASLAU
2016-03-24 21:11 ` Hans Hagen
2016-03-24 21:08 ` Hans Hagen
2016-03-14 8:52 ` Pablo Rodriguez [this message]
2016-05-20 4:39 ` docent.einstein
2016-03-11 9:37 ` Andreas Schneider
2016-03-11 9:43 ` Hans Hagen
2016-03-11 15:42 ` Mica Semrick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56E67BE5.7030605@gmx.es \
--to=oinos@gmx.es \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).