From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/40504 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans van der Meer Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: where luatex cache? Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 08:51:58 +0200 Message-ID: <573769F4-F3E9-4D15-ADA8-E708ECF235AC@science.uva.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208627274 17220 80.91.229.12 (19 Apr 2008 17:47:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:47:54 +0000 (UTC) To: NTG ConTeXt Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sat Apr 19 19:48:27 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jn70a-00070e-DR for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 08:57:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E66A1FB89; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 08:56:31 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 26172-05-4; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 08:55:47 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F931FBAC; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 08:55:47 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0B31FBAC for ; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 08:55:46 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 26902-06 for ; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 08:55:07 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.24]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505E61FB82 for ; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 08:53:02 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.84] (a82-95-102-36.adsl.xs4all.nl [82.95.102.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3J6r2KM094494 for ; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 08:53:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hansm@science.uva.nl) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:40504 Archived-At: I have a setup with several users, one acting as system administrator, the others as users. What can be said regarding the setup of the luatex cache? The possibilities I see are: (1) central cache in the /usr/local/texlive tree; (2) decentralized cache per user in its local texmf tree (3) decentralized cache per user in some unrelated directory (4) decentralized cache per user in /tmp (cleaned out by the system on restart, i think) Can someone comment on the merits of these alternatives? Hans van der Meer ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________