From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/95269 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wolfgang Schuster Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: smallcaps Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:00:19 +0200 Message-ID: <57738E23.9080908@gmail.com> References: <77161DD2-3975-4170-A7AF-1E10E1C265F7@ziggo.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8625554145447638101==" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1467190875 18125 80.91.229.3 (29 Jun 2016 09:01:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 09:01:15 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Jun 29 11:01:03 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from zapf.boekplan.nl ([5.39.185.232] helo=zapf.ntg.nl) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bIBMk-0008DX-KT for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:01:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B94210707; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:00:39 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at zapf.boekplan.nl Original-Received: from zapf.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zapf.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ubeQ8rpevoc6; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:00:35 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from zapf.ntg.nl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC04A1074D; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:00:35 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA86C10748 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:00:34 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at zapf.boekplan.nl Original-Received: from zapf.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zapf.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H4WvSA0BW7qr for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:00:32 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail-lf0-f48.google.com (mail-lf0-f48.google.com [209.85.215.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9D4810707 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:00:22 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by mail-lf0-f48.google.com with SMTP id l188so28663836lfe.2 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 02:00:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to; bh=ebrnEP0GASfnj3ehXGBs+RLS//vsjKAcKtItGAdqKoE=; b=0v7yYc0d7fUg2kFhCqkCkf/ziY8ARHyjXpotSRfI6mz4teEStpXK2yRIWuiuDflxAS TqveED1+RSSlYnOHsQzaNhRZSBkRhJp22DMO2bTJjz5Fc1G66ay5z8paKJP5WfnJg0sz rRfUacjzaFjIrqPZDyvfrStOBtDUFCABftkQi1VyC9hLRxmJzIA9B4IiS6O7KcZaeTwK 7yKzEEv+ZSGpp5uwa0/p+tVcU48ropo0RnGx5PqiRp5w0TE2GfkBDRmF8Lz/25oLK0Mu 8RbE9xG4qP9rkb58O9iS0I72Ym64ba70kPgPMc34AIhRxouc+qiCUtQI/rsKx8F9D0jY J3WQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to; bh=ebrnEP0GASfnj3ehXGBs+RLS//vsjKAcKtItGAdqKoE=; b=jtiS3Z+RzmSjjRPsv0ERfcqFYoHtof1TFIRsZw1+gxWm09I8NHaJvC6h7hFQnWui5l XJceCsEawDF501bXz/XNxwgmaMIIs5y7iBBNBlFadXgNWEL4C/18PSStuYs2vfINbuSC mjw2wNDkrDZg0o0L/CsH0qoDvIBd6YHQDfucScMvyuiIBMQtJeEgPyMvGK7MUcRYP2c7 VuvI01jkyNheCN6snGaVomXnDNljgL1i0HkEJt2VflSXVU4o8OO+7CcmcJxAkm6uT3hP 4/4VqeSEsXGTo63CsuTfYh9EMM3N56ZJoRBlYcbbLSrcCaxdWA1Ybv2fWn/2drdR2PQW Vv2w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLGcp/hc6HQMSMm1E/O7gyyEXlHRyI6Gb8DhZsIwgsBvahAlKuEjpqR6kkli4Q//Q== X-Received: by 10.25.213.213 with SMTP id m204mr2654311lfg.52.1467190821956; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 02:00:21 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from keima.localdomain (x2f2c66a.dyn.telefonica.de. [2.242.198.106]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g29sm447782ljg.25.2016.06.29.02.00.21 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Jun 2016 02:00:21 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Postbox 4.0.8 (Macintosh/20151105) In-Reply-To: <77161DD2-3975-4170-A7AF-1E10E1C265F7@ziggo.nl> X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Original-Sender: "ntg-context" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:95269 Archived-At: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============8625554145447638101== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020706010004020701080704" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020706010004020701080704 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > dr. Hans van der Meer > 29. Juni 2016 um 10:05 > I do not understand the behaviour of the \sc macro. I thought > smallcaps would turn out to be smaller than capitals. But I see no > difference between them except a subtle difference in letterspacing. > Am I doing something wrong here? > > Hans van der Meer > > Minimal example and output: > > \setuppapersize[A5][A5] > \starttext > \setupbodyfont[lmodern] > lmodern: uppercase smallcaps\blank > \setupbodyfont[cambria] > cambria: uppercase smallcaps\blank > \LuaTeX-version=0.\the\luatexversion\crlf > \ConTeXt-version=\contextversion\crlf > \stoptext Smallcaps changes only the layout of lowercase letters but some fonts let you also change uppercase letters. In the example below you can see how you can change uppercase and lowercase letter with the smcp and c2sc features. \definefontfeature[f:smcp][smcp=yes] \definefontfeature[f:c2sc][c2sc=yes] \setupbodyfont[pagella] \starttext An easy and breezy Sunday morning. {\feature[+][f:smcp]An easy and breezy Sunday morning.} {\feature[+][f:c2sc]An easy and breezy Sunday morning.} {\feature[+][f:c2sc,f:smcp]An easy and breezy Sunday morning.} \stoptext Wolfgang --------------020706010004020701080704 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
29. Juni 2016 um 10:05
I do not understand the behaviour of the \sc macro. I thought smallcaps would turn out to be smaller than capitals. But I see no difference between them except a subtle difference in letterspacing. Am I doing something wrong here?

Hans van der Meer

Minimal example and output:

\setuppapersize[A5][A5]
\starttext
\setupbodyfont[lmodern]
lmodern: uppercase <ABC-{\sc ABC}> smallcaps\blank
\setupbodyfont[cambria]
cambria: uppercase <ABC-{\sc ABC}> smallcaps\blank
\LuaTeX-version=0.\the\luatexversion\crlf
\ConTeXt-version=\contextversion\crlf
\stoptext
Smallcaps changes only the layout of lowercase letters but some fonts let you also change uppercase letters.

In the example below you can see how you can change uppercase and lowercase letter with the smcp and c2sc features.

\definefontfeature[f:smcp][smcp=yes]
\definefontfeature[f:c2sc][c2sc=yes]

\setupbodyfont[pagella]

\starttext

An easy and breezy Sunday morning.

{\feature[+][f:smcp]An easy and breezy Sunday morning.}

{\feature[+][f:c2sc]An easy and breezy Sunday morning.}

{\feature[+][f:c2sc,f:smcp]An easy and breezy Sunday morning.}

\stoptext

Wolfgang
--------------020706010004020701080704-- --===============8625554145447638101== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KSWYgeW91ciBxdWVzdGlvbiBpcyBvZiBpbnRlcmVz dCB0byBvdGhlcnMgYXMgd2VsbCwgcGxlYXNlIGFkZCBhbiBlbnRyeSB0byB0aGUgV2lraSEKCm1h aWxsaXN0IDogbnRnLWNvbnRleHRAbnRnLm5sIC8gaHR0cDovL3d3dy5udGcubmwvbWFpbG1hbi9s aXN0aW5mby9udGctY29udGV4dAp3ZWJwYWdlICA6IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cucHJhZ21hLWFkZS5ubCAv IGh0dHA6Ly90ZXguYWFuaGV0Lm5ldAphcmNoaXZlICA6IGh0dHA6Ly9mb3VuZHJ5LnN1cGVsZWMu ZnIvcHJvamVjdHMvY29udGV4dHJldi8Kd2lraSAgICAgOiBodHRwOi8vY29udGV4dGdhcmRlbi5u ZXQKX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18= --===============8625554145447638101==--