Mikael P. Sundqvist
6. September 2016 um 21:07

Dear all,

since I got no answer here I cross posted on stackexchange (see
http://tex.stackexchange.com/q/328147/52406). Now, I got a solution to
this from Aditya. It seems that it is not yet clear to me (or Aditya,
as far as I understand from the reply) which float placements that
respects the \setupfloats[indentnext=yes] and which not. Or more
importantly, why.

To make this email thread more complete, the solution of Aditya adds

\unprotect
\def\page_one_place_float_auto
{\page_one_place_float_otherwise\nonoindentation}
\def\page_one_place_float_bottom
{\page_one_place_float_otherwise\nonoindentation}
\def\page_one_place_float_margin
{\page_margin_blocks_process_float\nonoindentation}
\def\page_one_place_float_leftmargin
{\page_one_place_float_side_indeed\page_sides_process_float_leftmargin\nonoindentation}
\def\page_one_place_float_rightmargin{\page_one_place_float_side_indeed\page_sides_process_float_rightmargin\nonoindentation}
\protect
When backwards compatiblity is a reason for not changing this adding a hook can be solution, e.g.

-\def\page_one_place_float_auto       {\page_one_place_float_otherwise}
+\def\page_one_place_float_auto       {\page_one_place_float_otherwise\rootfloatparameter\c!next}

which can be used with \setupfloat[next=\indentation]

Wolfgang