From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/20611 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jonathan Kew Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.xetex,gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt-XeTeX question Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 14:28:56 +0100 Message-ID: <57bc824363d25869545949b44f33667b@sil.org> References: <4EDE04C0-8781-4951-BBCE-023EF5F69573@mac.com> <865F706B-AFA8-4BDD-BF3E-DFEE1C0475C2@mac.com> <20050601131540.31203@mail.comp.lancs.ac.uk> Reply-To: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1117632783 7716 80.91.229.2 (1 Jun 2005 13:33:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: xetex-bounces-WUdSmCIlby8@public.gmane.org Wed Jun 01 15:33:01 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from dmz-169.daimi.au.dk ([130.225.2.169] helo=tug.org) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DdTIn-0000kW-FA for gctx-xetex-Uylq5CNFT+jYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 15:30:33 +0200 Original-Received: from tug.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tug.org (8.11.7-20030920/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j51DN8803643; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 15:23:08 +0200 Original-Received: from mail.link77.net (mail.jaars.org [208.145.81.85]) by tug.org (8.11.7-20030920/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j51DMv822376 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 15:22:57 +0200 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 130.225.16.26 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 130.225.2.178 X-Scanned-By: RAE MPP/Clamd http://raeinternet.com/mpp Original-Received: from [172.17.1.146] (account jonathan_kew-A0FDNjJqwt5D60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org [172.17.1.146] verified) by mail.link77.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP-TLS id 73884258; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 09:28:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050601131540.31203-O5WfVfzUwx9baopHwiXPDzYRy0cijUJx@public.gmane.org> Original-To: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) X-DAIMI-Spam-Score: 0 () X-BeenThere: xetex-WUdSmCIlby8@public.gmane.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: xetex-bounces-WUdSmCIlby8@public.gmane.org Errors-To: xetex-bounces-WUdSmCIlby8@public.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.xetex:186 gmane.comp.tex.context:20611 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:20611 On 1 Jun 2005, at 2:15 pm, Adam Lindsay wrote: > [I'm copying to the XeTeX list--this may not be ConTeXt-specific. -atl] > Dalyoung said this at Wed, 1 Jun 2005 22:03:37 +0900: > >>> 1) Recently, I upgraded ConTeXt new version and got a problem in >>> compilation. However, after upgrading texexec and creating format >>> files, it is working fine with some warning messages as following: >>> >>> WARNING: Type1 font data returned by OFAStreamPSDownload isn't in >>> the correct format required by the Adobe Type 1 Font Format >>> specification. >>> WARNING: Type1 font data returned by OFAStreamPSDownload isn't in >>> the correct format required by the Adobe Type 1 Font Format >>> specification. >>> WARNING: Type1 font data returned by OFAStreamPSDownload isn't in >>> the correct format required by the Adobe Type 1 Font Format >>> specification. > > I noticed this too on my recent re-install. I presume it's an issue > with > legacy type1 .pfb files being wrapped in a Mac format. However, I am > not > 100% certain this issue is independent of XeTeX on Tiger: I didn't > really test the previous ConTeXt with XeTeX on 10.4. It's a XeTeX+Tiger issue, not related to the specific format being used but to the way we're supporting .pfb fonts (which the OS doesn't really support). Something changed between Panther and Tiger that made this start happening, although the output still seems to be OK (in particular, the .pfb fonts that the warnings relate to still seem to render fine). I have reported this to Apple and am trying to determine whether it is in fact a problem with what XeTeX is doing (in which case I need some more information on just what is wrong), or an Apple problem. Maybe I can get some answers at WWDC next week, if I can corner the right people. > >>> I don't know the causes of these warnings. I am using personal >>> script file for Korean, but there was no warning before in the same >>> condition. > > The first thing to figure out is if XeLaTeX users encounter this as > well > on Tiger when using legacy fonts. Yes, they will, but if they're running from an environment like TeXShop rather than Terminal, they may not have noticed the messages, as they'll appear only in the system log, which most people don't usually look at. JK