A book is not at all a repository of code or a reference.
It can be foundational, and in that case you'll just keep on reading  
for many years.
(the TeX Book)

A serious update and expansion of the manual would be enough.

Best

-a-


On 9 Apr 2008, at 09:06, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:

> 2008/4/9, Gour <gour@mail.inet.hr>:
>>  Andrea> Always asked for.  But nobody raise a hand...:-)
>>  Andrea> I would read it eagerly
>>  I would even buy it ;)
>
> I wouldn't - I've a shelf full of development books but always only
> use online docs. In this area books simply are too slow.
>
> Greetlings, Hraban
> ______________________________________________________________________ 
> _____________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an  
> entry to the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ 
> ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
> ______________________________________________________________________ 
> _____________

--------------------------------------------------
Andrea Valle
--------------------------------------------------
CIRMA - DAMS
Università degli Studi di Torino
--> http://www.cirma.unito.it/andrea/
--> http://www.myspace.com/andreavalle
--> andrea.valle@unito.it
--------------------------------------------------


"
Think of it as seasoning
. noise [salt] is boring
. F(blah) [food without salt] can be boring
. F(noise, blah) can be really tasty
"
(Ken Perlin on noise)