* Bug? thinrule in natural table & MKIV
@ 2009-02-05 14:52 Bart C. Wise
2009-02-05 16:43 ` Wolfgang Schuster
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Bart C. Wise @ 2009-02-05 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Context Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 853 bytes --]
I put a thinrule in a table as follows:
\starttext
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD\thinrule\eTD\eTR
\eTABLE
\stoptext
It worked fine under MKII. However, when I switched to MKIV (both current and
beta) I got the following error message:
! Missing { inserted.
<inserted text>
{
<to be read again>
&
<inserted text> ...blrow \makeTBL 1 1 \nexttblcol
\endtblrow
\flushtbltoks ->\begintbl \the \tbltoks
\endtbl
\endTBL ...x {\trialtypesettingtrue \flushtbltoks
}\lettbldis \maximumcol
\z...
\eTABLE ...}}\eTBL }\removeunwantedspaces \endTBL
\stopTBLprocessing \fi \eg...
l.4 \eTABLE
Is this a bug?
Is there a workaround?
Thanks,
Bart
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2309 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 487 bytes --]
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug? thinrule in natural table & MKIV
2009-02-05 14:52 Bug? thinrule in natural table & MKIV Bart C. Wise
@ 2009-02-05 16:43 ` Wolfgang Schuster
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Schuster @ 2009-02-05 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Am 05.02.2009 um 15:52 schrieb Bart C. Wise:
> I put a thinrule in a table as follows:
>
> \starttext
> \bTABLE
> \bTR\bTD\thinrule\eTD\eTR
> \eTABLE
> \stoptext
>
> It worked fine under MKII. However, when I switched to MKIV (both
> current and beta) I got the following error message:
[...]
> Is this a bug?
Yes, a better example is:
\starttext
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD \bgroup\carryoverpar\egroup \eTD\eTR
\eTABLE
\stoptext
Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-02-05 16:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-02-05 14:52 Bug? thinrule in natural table & MKIV Bart C. Wise
2009-02-05 16:43 ` Wolfgang Schuster
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).