ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas A.Schmitz <thomas.schmitz@uni-bonn.de>
Subject: Re: indenting list items.
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:22:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f1cf767364054a1b4afd4ca040d8fb5@uni-bonn.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47237.159.46.248.229.1110370896.squirrel@159.46.248.229>

First: I agree that when you begin using Context, the documentation 
isn't as helpful as one could hope (John, of course, is not a 
beginner). But seeing that Hans is so busy developing Context, it's 
easy to see why there isn't more time to write documentation about it. 
And I think Patrick's wiki is making great progress and beginning to be 
filled with lots of interesting things.

In this case, however, I find the handbook quite clear. \setupitemize 
takes three brackets, the first one is defined as "number each." This 
defines the level of the itemization you want to set up, 1 being the 
outer or topmost level etc. Every \startitemize is located at a precise 
level (i.e. nested within other itemizations or not), so there's no use 
for this first pair of brackets.

HTH

Thomas

On Mar 9, 2005, at 1:21 PM, Gerben Wierda wrote:

>> Second question: The definition of \setupitemize seems to use
>> three sets of square brackets but \startitemize seems to only use
>> two. So, at the \startitemize level, which paramaters go in which
>> set of braces?
>
> If I might chime in: it would be nice to see some sort of extended
> explanation with examples for the format used in ConTeXt's 
> documentation.
> Because I often look at it and it does not immediately hit me what is
> meant. Now I am stupid, I know, but still, some sort of explanation 
> should
> be nice (the manual I read more or less used the syntax without 
> thoroughly
> explaining them with examples, or at least that is what I got when 
> reading
> it. Might have been me.).
>
> G

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-09 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-08 19:14 John R. Culleton
2005-03-09  7:42 ` Patrick Gundlach
2005-03-09 15:28   ` John R. Culleton
2005-03-09 20:05     ` Patrick Gundlach
2005-03-09 12:21 ` Gerben Wierda
2005-03-09 15:22   ` Thomas A.Schmitz [this message]
2005-03-09 20:07   ` Patrick Gundlach

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5f1cf767364054a1b4afd4ca040d8fb5@uni-bonn.de \
    --to=thomas.schmitz@uni-bonn.de \
    --cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).