From: Hans Hagen <j.hagen@xs4all.nl>
To: news3@nililand.de, mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: ! error: (nodes): attempt to double-free math_char node 100300, ignored
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 17:45:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ffb159e-8b22-357a-8ad6-410b0289e584@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1jyp4nvlplkq2$.dlg@nililand.de>
On 4/30/2018 4:59 PM, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
> Am Mon, 30 Apr 2018 15:49:11 +0200 schrieb Hans Hagen:
>
>>> While discussion the issue with the unicode-math maintainer the
>>> question came up if mathalphabets like \mathrm etc should better use
>>> mode=node or mode=base. Do you have recommendation?
>
>> not really as i have no clue how he implements math alphabets
>
> Imho like in traditional tex as new math family with \newfam etc.
in that case only base mode will work as there is no callback doing text
there (makes no sense)
> From the output there is a clear difference, only with base mode one
> gets ligatures and kerning.
>
> $\mathtestnode{VA fin}$ (node mode: without ligature and kerning)
>
> $\mathtestbase{VA fin}$ (base mode: with ligature and kerning)
>
> But I'm not sure which output is the typographically sounder one.
if one needs text in math then using a boxed approach calling some real
text fonts makes more sense
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-30 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-28 13:11 Ulrike Fischer
2018-04-28 15:42 ` Hans Hagen
2018-04-28 15:57 ` Ulrike Fischer
2018-04-28 19:41 ` Hans Hagen
2018-04-29 12:02 ` Ulrike Fischer
2018-04-30 13:49 ` Hans Hagen
2018-04-30 14:59 ` Ulrike Fischer
2018-04-30 15:45 ` Hans Hagen [this message]
2018-04-30 16:45 ` Ulrike Fischer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5ffb159e-8b22-357a-8ad6-410b0289e584@xs4all.nl \
--to=j.hagen@xs4all.nl \
--cc=news3@nililand.de \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).