From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/13779 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Re: first attempt to run mp (system error) -- summary? Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 00:16:04 +0200 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: <6.0.0.22.2.20031009001449.02bf4f60@server-1> References: <000901c38ca6$8af7a0d0$0500a8c0@best> <1065598042.4594.36.camel@PawCooLinux> <6.0.0.22.2.20031008094621.02a62ef0@server-1> <006f01c38dd9$92077dd0$0500a8c0@best> Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1065652613 18449 80.91.224.253 (8 Oct 2003 22:36:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 22:36:53 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Thu Oct 09 00:36:51 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A7MvL-0003Xt-00 for ; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 00:36:51 +0200 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A57B10B62; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 00:36:49 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from mail.solcon.net (mail.solcon.net [212.45.33.5]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B1210AFC for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 00:30:51 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from server-1.pragma-net.nl (dsl-212-84-128-085.solcon.nl [212.84.128.85]) by mail.solcon.net (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h98MUcn25920 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 00:30:38 +0200 Original-Received: by server-1.pragma-net.nl (Postfix, from userid 65534) id E65B317B08; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 00:30:43 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from laptop-3.wxs.nl (unknown [10.100.1.191]) by server-1.pragma-net.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 220BA17AE5 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 22:30:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender: hagen-mail@server-1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl In-Reply-To: Original-References: <000901c38ca6$8af7a0d0$0500a8c0@best> <1065598042.4594.36.camel@PawCooLinux> <6.0.0.22.2.20031008094621.02a62ef0@server-1> <006f01c38dd9$92077dd0$0500a8c0@best> Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:13779 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:13779 At 23:41 08/10/2003, you wrote: >Hi again, > >... > > > Doesn't hurt. ...But wait -- I aks to be on the safe side: since I > remember, > > I use common formats (and every other files in texmf tree) for linux and > > windows. Is there ANY reason to generate nativ format for each operating > > system? Is there any reason not to make common any other texmf > > files? > >If you have the same system on both sides, I think you are safe. It >looks as if web2c systems can share formats if the web2c version >number is identical. indeed and this is what makes tex live such a nice system however, here i organize my binaries like texmf-mswin texmf-linux etc because i often have more modern pdftex's on windows -) Hans