* About Latex compatibility module
@ 2020-05-23 23:43 Jairo A. del Rio
2020-05-25 15:54 ` Hans Hagen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jairo A. del Rio @ 2020-05-23 23:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 632 bytes --]
Hi everyone! I was reading some old posts on TeX.SX about LaTeX support on
ConTeXt and I found the following:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110822085249/https://modules.contextgarden.net/LaTeX
However, not only the module seems to be deprecated, but there's no more
info about the module now (links are broken and the like). Btw the test
file (latextest.tex) included fails to compile:
> tex error on line 165 in file t-ltmsen.tex: ! Undefined control sequence
>> \newskip\@rightskip \@rightskip \z@skip
Is it possible to make it work? I think it would be nice if some minimal
LaTeX macros were supported. Thank you in advance!
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 936 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: t-latex-2008.12.14.zip --]
[-- Type: application/zip, Size: 51576 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 493 bytes --]
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: About Latex compatibility module
2020-05-23 23:43 About Latex compatibility module Jairo A. del Rio
@ 2020-05-25 15:54 ` Hans Hagen
2020-05-25 17:34 ` Wolfgang Schuster
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen @ 2020-05-25 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users, Jairo A. del Rio
On 5/24/2020 1:43 AM, Jairo A. del Rio wrote:
> Hi everyone! I was reading some old posts on TeX.SX about LaTeX support
> on ConTeXt and I found the following:
>
> https://web.archive.org/web/20110822085249/https://modules.contextgarden.net/LaTeX
>
> However, not only the module seems to be deprecated, but there's no more
> info about the module now (links are broken and the like). Btw the test
> file (latextest.tex) included fails to compile:
>
> > tex error on line 165 in file t-ltmsen.tex: ! Undefined control sequence
>
> >> \newskip\@rightskip \@rightskip \z@skip
looks like someplace one has to define \z@skip to be 0pt (in this case
it's actually redundant code because a newskip is likely to be zero)
> Is it possible to make it work? I think it would be nice if some minimal
> LaTeX macros were supported. Thank you in advance!
Depends. It's not that hard to define some basic 'handle some latex
cases' module but the question is "for what purpose?". When I look at
those decade old files in that archive I see a lot of messy code that
one needs to isolate and even then we can assume that users use more
than a few commands. When they only use the top-ten commands, no
problem, but when they start setting lengths or so ... why use context
then. I have no problem mapping a few commands so that new users can
cut-n-paste some code as a starter but somehoen has to come up with the
list of commands and minimal test files then.
Apart from the (probably a bit boring) challenge I think it doesn't pay
off. Also, the systems are conceptually too different I think.
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: About Latex compatibility module
2020-05-25 15:54 ` Hans Hagen
@ 2020-05-25 17:34 ` Wolfgang Schuster
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Schuster @ 2020-05-25 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users, Hans Hagen; +Cc: Jairo A. del Rio
Hans Hagen schrieb am 25.05.2020 um 17:54:
> On 5/24/2020 1:43 AM, Jairo A. del Rio wrote:
>> Hi everyone! I was reading some old posts on TeX.SX about LaTeX
>> support on ConTeXt and I found the following:
>>
>> https://web.archive.org/web/20110822085249/https://modules.contextgarden.net/LaTeX
>>
>>
>> However, not only the module seems to be deprecated, but there's no
>> more info about the module now (links are broken and the like). Btw
>> the test file (latextest.tex) included fails to compile:
>>
>> > tex error on line 165 in file t-ltmsen.tex: ! Undefined control
>> sequence
>>
>> >> \newskip\@rightskip \@rightskip \z@skip
>
> looks like someplace one has to define \z@skip to be 0pt (in this case
> it's actually redundant code because a newskip is likely to be zero)
In many cases one can replace the old name with @ with current names,
e.g. \z@skip will become \zeroskip.
>> Is it possible to make it work? I think it would be nice if some
>> minimal LaTeX macros were supported. Thank you in advance!
> Depends. It's not that hard to define some basic 'handle some latex
> cases' module but the question is "for what purpose?". When I look at
> those decade old files in that archive I see a lot of messy code that
> one needs to isolate and even then we can assume that users use more
> than a few commands. When they only use the top-ten commands, no
> problem, but when they start setting lengths or so ... why use context
> then. I have no problem mapping a few commands so that new users can
> cut-n-paste some code as a starter but somehoen has to come up with the
> list of commands and minimal test files then.
>
> Apart from the (probably a bit boring) challenge I think it doesn't pay
> off. Also, the systems are conceptually too different I think.
In the end you have to port the base commands of LaTeX which includes
- lists
- floats
- references
- font switches
- math
- etc.
and just another one (and another one ...).
It's just not worth the effort and we should spend the time to improve
ConTeXt and add missing features.
Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-25 17:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-23 23:43 About Latex compatibility module Jairo A. del Rio
2020-05-25 15:54 ` Hans Hagen
2020-05-25 17:34 ` Wolfgang Schuster
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).