* XML in latest betas (MkIV & LMTX)
@ 2019-06-02 11:17 Pablo Rodriguez
2019-06-02 12:12 ` Hans Hagen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Rodriguez @ 2019-06-02 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Dear list,
I have just installed latest betas for both MkIV and LMTX.
Compiling exactly the same XML sources (a book on ConTeXt in Spanish),
MkIV needs 40s and LMTX more than 52s.
This is the first time I get such a difference in compilation times.
I’m afraid I can’t be sure that output is the same, since different
spacing gives different page numbers.
I wonder whether this might be an issue.
Many thanks for your help,
Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: XML in latest betas (MkIV & LMTX)
2019-06-02 11:17 XML in latest betas (MkIV & LMTX) Pablo Rodriguez
@ 2019-06-02 12:12 ` Hans Hagen
2019-06-02 13:07 ` Pablo Rodriguez
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen @ 2019-06-02 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
On 6/2/2019 1:17 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I have just installed latest betas for both MkIV and LMTX.
>
> Compiling exactly the same XML sources (a book on ConTeXt in Spanish),
> MkIV needs 40s and LMTX more than 52s.
Hm. Is that the first time you compare a MKIV runs with an LMTX run for
that document? I assume that you time multiple runs.
> This is the first time I get such a difference in compilation times.
On the average LMTX should be faster than MKIV (and definitely not 20%
slower). I assume it's regular luatex?
> I’m afraid I can’t be sure that output is the same, since different
> spacing gives different page numbers.
Not sure where that comes from. There are no fundamental changes wrr
spacing.
> I wonder whether this might be an issue.
Hard to say without a MWE that exposes the same
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: XML in latest betas (MkIV & LMTX)
2019-06-02 12:12 ` Hans Hagen
@ 2019-06-02 13:07 ` Pablo Rodriguez
2019-06-02 15:18 ` Hans Hagen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Rodriguez @ 2019-06-02 13:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ntg-context
On 6/2/19 2:12 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 6/2/2019 1:17 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> [...]
>> Compiling exactly the same XML sources (a book on ConTeXt in Spanish),
>> MkIV needs 40s and LMTX more than 52s.
>
> Hm. Is that the first time you compare a MKIV runs with an LMTX run for
> that document? I assume that you time multiple runs.
No, it isn’t the first time I compare and I time multiple runs.
>> This is the first time I get such a difference in compilation times.
>
> On the average LMTX should be faster than MKIV (and definitely not 20%
> slower). I assume it's regular luatex?
Sorry, this was my fault. I thought I was running luatex and it was
luajittex.
MkIV times with luatex are 51.x seconds, which is a tiny bit faster than
LMTX (52.x seconds). But this is perfectly normal.
>> I’m afraid I can’t be sure that output is the same, since different
>> spacing gives different page numbers.
>
> Not sure where that comes from. There are no fundamental changes wrr
> spacing.
Font expansion (as reported in
https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2019/095175.html).
>> I wonder whether this might be an issue.
> Hard to say without a MWE that exposes the same
Sorry for the noise,
Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-02 15:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-06-02 11:17 XML in latest betas (MkIV & LMTX) Pablo Rodriguez
2019-06-02 12:12 ` Hans Hagen
2019-06-02 13:07 ` Pablo Rodriguez
2019-06-02 15:18 ` Hans Hagen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).