* equation numbering
@ 2011-11-21 20:39 Meer, H. van der
2011-11-23 20:17 ` Otared Kavian
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Meer, H. van der @ 2011-11-21 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ConTeXt NTG
ConTeXt still has some mysteries for me ;-)
This time it is the equationnumbering.
Doing \placeformula\startformula..\stopformula gives the equation a certain number, lets say (1.5).
Now I change the call to \placeformula[equ:thisfml]\startformula..\stopformula and the number changes to (1.6).
Why is this? What I have in mind is to number all formula consecutively with (chapternumber.1), chapternumber.2) etc. Regardless whether I want to reference some of the equations later on and some can stay without a reference because that is not needed. Nevertheless, the ascending numbering pleases me.
Hans van der Meer
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: equation numbering
2011-11-21 20:39 equation numbering Meer, H. van der
@ 2011-11-23 20:17 ` Otared Kavian
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Otared Kavian @ 2011-11-23 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Hi Hans,
Could you please give an example in which you see the behaviour you are reporting? I tried with mkii and mkiv but could not reproduce what you describe.
Best regards: OK
On 21 nov. 2011, at 21:39, Meer, H. van der wrote:
> ConTeXt still has some mysteries for me ;-)
> This time it is the equationnumbering.
> Doing \placeformula\startformula..\stopformula gives the equation a certain number, lets say (1.5).
> Now I change the call to \placeformula[equ:thisfml]\startformula..\stopformula and the number changes to (1.6).
>
> Why is this? What I have in mind is to number all formula consecutively with (chapternumber.1), chapternumber.2) etc. Regardless whether I want to reference some of the equations later on and some can stay without a reference because that is not needed. Nevertheless, the ascending numbering pleases me.
>
> Hans van der Meer
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-23 20:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-11-21 20:39 equation numbering Meer, H. van der
2011-11-23 20:17 ` Otared Kavian
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).