[NTG-context] Re: issue when the encapsulation ‘startitem stopitem’ command is in another self-defined command

[Wolfgang Schuster <wolfgang.schuster.lists@gmail.com>]

autumnus schrieb am 28.12.2024 um 15:44:
> hi, Wolfgang
>
> Sorry, but after I tested it, it did output all the lists and their ordinal numbers.
> However, if I used the horizontal parameter, it didn't go the way I expected.
>
> The expected output
>            item 1   sym @
>            item 3  item 4
>
> But the actual output is:
>            sym @
>            item 1   item 3
>            item 4
>
> But if I remove the horizontal argument,
> the list is laid out in the normal order:
>          item 1
>          sym @
>          item 3
>          item 4
>
> What should I do with it?

When you use the "horizontal" or "random" option Context collects all 
item entries enclosed
in a \startitem / \stopitem pair and flushes the collection at the end 
of the itemize environment.

All normal entries which don't use them item-pair are placed as is 
before the collected entries.

While there is a \startspecialitem / \stopspecialitem pair with a \sym 
option, the entries aren't
collected at the moment.

Wolfgang

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror)
archive  : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
wiki     : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________