[NTG-context] Re: \em issue in MkXL (2024.03.05 11:26)

[Henning Hraban Ramm <texml@fiee.net>]

Am 08.03.24 um 18:50 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context:
> Dear list,
> 
> the following latest gets differents results when compiled with MkXL and
> MkIV (in current latest from 2024.03.05 11:26):
> 
>    \definefontfamily[mainface][rm][TeX Gyre Termes]
>      [features={default, quality},
>       it={style: regular, features:{default, quality, slanted}},
>       sl={style: regular, features:{default, quality, slanted}}]
> 
>    \setupbodyfontenvironment
>        [default]
>        [em=italic]
> 
>    \setupbodyfont[mainface]
>    \starttext
>    \startTEXpage[offset=1em]
>    a\\
>    \em b\\
>    \em c\\
>    \em d\\
>    \stopTEXpage
>    \stoptext
> 
> LMTX gets b, c and d in slanted form.
> 
> LuaTeX gets only b and c in slanted form.

With latest LMTX (2024.03.05), b and d are slanted, as I would expect.

This might be just a test case, but I’d avoid switches like \em without 
grouping.

Hraban
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror)
archive  : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
wiki     : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________