From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/46314 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Yue Wang" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: math detail Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:03:03 +0800 Message-ID: <68bfdc900812132003n63749akbe322c7d4c62ef1e@mail.gmail.com> References: <68bfdc900812130705y11b6e1ajcf4df53d8517c20c@mail.gmail.com> <68bfdc900812130711h897f5eah75986f7fafb9bcc0@mail.gmail.com> <2FEDFA35-BB70-4507-8A2A-766EEEF8B2C6@st.estfiles.de> <68bfdc900812131019l6763bd7bp229d3f26986d8c99@mail.gmail.com> <8843E9C7-9D08-4571-8E26-502D13EE4024@st.estfiles.de> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1229227566 14090 80.91.229.12 (14 Dec 2008 04:06:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 04:06:06 +0000 (UTC) To: "mailing list for ConTeXt users" Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sun Dec 14 05:07:10 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LBiG4-0006s9-49 for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 05:07:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EEE11FBBE; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 05:05:54 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22443-05-8; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 05:04:52 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203981FB95; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 05:04:52 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8C61FB82 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 05:04:49 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22955-04-3 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 05:04:16 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.159]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F7A1FBBD for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 05:03:04 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so1006096fgb.8 for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:03:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Kcd91JPh89vE2yRPbzUFtDxaQET/hUva0vDdUdDzxzc=; b=V20AXPjDD4jrvZxEUURaFuoyblapDzMyYDZHmmFMES+/DjnZG4CLepjxdI+Iq+o8Y7 qtiPWvmHXrqz4a5ZVuGXJrddRBeKJAXoMw2xM/LPfTY/2IA/hk5gPQLdEfbrm/VLPUMl EtIn0SW0kYEann+uR1L/CUe979L8sh0ANI914= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=HjWoUq/7ZHjy9Moh+SI3hK/dGk0HTfTFHtY19pcyyMkJhbGos4y5eHb9VqOFNaZPKQ H5aDfI3mdWkG6InoDsAaEujcAbg15SedCzQzdxmBhtXWUrOMY/ND5T5HTZM+oJlaiNdh 1MUNhOP9W9jZMPaTbbwwI5plCNNDNDN5/R7Xc= Original-Received: by 10.86.59.2 with SMTP id h2mr2959159fga.73.1229227384006; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:03:04 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.86.1.11 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:03:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8843E9C7-9D08-4571-8E26-502D13EE4024@st.estfiles.de> Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:46314 Archived-At: > > I see the pictures and they demonstrate how weird the problem is: > In the case of "V\high{0}" the "0" is higher than in "$V^0$", > and yet the interline space gets NOT disturbed!!! > > Or put it the other way round: > You use $V^0$, which doesn't move the "0" as high as "\high{0}" would do, > and nevertheless the distance to the line above gets increased!!! > TeX did this quite right, I think. The bounding box of the inline formula looks ok. Concerning your \high stuffs: you can read the code and it is quite clear that the box dimension has nothing to do with those within \high{}, no matter where the 0 is placed, the bounding box of "V\high{0}" is still the same: \def\dodohighlow {\ifx\fontsize\empty \ifmmode \ifnum\fam<0 \tx \else \holamathfont \fi \else \tx \fi \else \tx \fi} \def\dohighlow#1#2#3#4#5% todo, named fontdimens {\dontleavehmode \bgroup \scratchdimen\ifdim\fontexheight\textfont2=1ex #2\textfont2\else #3ex\fi \advance\scratchdimen #4ex \kern.1ex \setbox\scratchbox\hbox{#1\scratchdimen\hbox{\dodohighlow#5}}% \ht\scratchbox\strutheight \dp\scratchbox\strutdepth \box\scratchbox \egroup} \unexpanded\def\high{\dohighlow\raise\mathsupnormal{.86}{0}} \unexpanded\def\low {\dohighlow\lower\mathsubnormal{.48}{0}} > > 1) This doesn't make sense, does it? > 2) Why gets the line space increased even though the "0" is not that high?! > 3) How can the behaviour of "$V^0$" be adjusted in such way as "\high{0}" > does if it is quite right, why adjust it? > (i.e. set the "0" but dont move away from the line above) > > ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________