From: "Meer, H. van der" <H.vanderMeer@uva.nl>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: setupinteraction kills dodoubleargument
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:50:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6B0D9403-387E-4CAB-AA67-4412711DC3EE@uva.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6B1D3485-7010-4190-9CB7-34EEFF22D56B@googlemail.com>
On 21 nov. 2011, at 14:55, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>
> Am 21.11.2011 um 14:25 schrieb Hans van der Meer:
>
>> In my documents I use a macro in footnotes, which is defined though \dodoubleargument.
>> However, enabling interactions (which must be done too) plays havoc with \dodoubleargument, though \dosingleargument seems to escape unharmed.
>>
>> Why is this? Can it be repaired?
>
> Change your definition for \testa and \testb to
>
> \unexpanded\def\testa{\dosingleempty\dotesta}
Not needed, because \dosingleargument, \dosingleempty are not harmed.
>
> and
>
> \unexpanded\def\testb{\dodoubleempty\dotestb}
This is a solution, so I can go on with my document.
But isn't it better in general when the problem is solved in \footnote? Because outside it I encountered no problem with the \dodouble's. It would be a pity if everyone who tries to something of the sort, will have to tackle this problem (unless looking into the archives of this group, of course). I was lucky, because the addition of \setupinteraction[state=start] was one of the last things I changed and thus suggested itself readily as the source of the troubles.
Maybe it can be put on some todo/later-todo list?
>
> Wolfgang
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
Hans van der Meer
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-21 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-21 13:25 Hans van der Meer
2011-11-21 13:55 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2011-11-21 14:50 ` Meer, H. van der [this message]
2011-11-21 15:45 ` Hans Hagen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6B0D9403-387E-4CAB-AA67-4412711DC3EE@uva.nl \
--to=h.vandermeer@uva.nl \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).