* Footnotes in titles, 3 years old file compiles now different
@ 2018-08-07 6:14 Huseyin Özoguz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Huseyin Özoguz @ 2018-08-07 6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ntg-context
Hello together,
I have a file from 2015, which contains something like this:
\section{title\footnote{ftn-content}}
And the compiled pdf from then show the footnote correct and with the
number in order to the other footnotes.
But now I have compiled it again without differences, and the footnote
disappears. I have read about this and basically it says that apart from
local footnotes its not possible anymore (?) to set footnotes in titles
(s.t. the numbers stay in order to all the other footnotes).
What changed since 2015? That is a problem for me because I have to
compile a book from then to print it again (with minor other corrections
in the text, but nothing in style). How to achieve the same result like
back then?
Thank you!
Huseyin
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Footnotes in titles, 3 years old file compiles now different
2018-08-07 6:29 Huseyin Özoguz
@ 2018-08-07 9:20 ` Lutz Haseloff
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Lutz Haseloff @ 2018-08-07 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1023 bytes --]
Hi Huseyin,
i tried your line of code with recent ConTeXt and luatex and i think it worked fine.
See attached files.
Greetings Lutz
Am 7. August 2018 08:29:10 MESZ schrieb "Huseyin Özoguz" <h.oezoguz@mmnetz.de>:
>I forget: I use now luatex beta 0.80.0 (and Context from 2015.04.15),
>but the old pdf was compiled with luatex 0.77.0, is that the
>difference,
>which deleted the footnote?
>
>(I hope this does not break the thread....never learned how to use
>mail-lists with thunderbird)
>
>___________________________________________________________________________________
>If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry
>to the Wiki!
>
>maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
>http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
>webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
>archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
>wiki : http://contextgarden.net
>___________________________________________________________________________________
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1387 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: titlefootnote.pdf --]
[-- Type: application/pdf, Size: 8350 bytes --]
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #3: titlefootnote.tex --]
[-- Type: text/x-tex; name="titlefootnote.tex", Size: 59 bytes --]
\starttext
\section{title\footnote{ftn-content}}
\stoptext
[-- Attachment #4: Type: text/plain, Size: 492 bytes --]
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Footnotes in titles, 3 years old file compiles now different
@ 2018-08-07 6:29 Huseyin Özoguz
2018-08-07 9:20 ` Lutz Haseloff
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Huseyin Özoguz @ 2018-08-07 6:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ntg-context
I forget: I use now luatex beta 0.80.0 (and Context from 2015.04.15),
but the old pdf was compiled with luatex 0.77.0, is that the difference,
which deleted the footnote?
(I hope this does not break the thread....never learned how to use
mail-lists with thunderbird)
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-08-07 9:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-08-07 6:14 Footnotes in titles, 3 years old file compiles now different Huseyin Özoguz
2018-08-07 6:29 Huseyin Özoguz
2018-08-07 9:20 ` Lutz Haseloff
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).