presentations in ConTeXt

presentations in ConTeXt

[Thomas A. Schmitz]

I've decided to bite the bullet and do my presentations in ConTeXt  
this term. So far, I'm quite satisfied. I've done only very basic  
stuff so far (if you're interested, you can have a look at http:// 
www.uni-bonn.de/www/Philologie/Personal/Schmitz/Dateien.html ), but I  
like the result. The background is just a pdf-image that I created  
with metapost and reused as a page background (I found this was  
faster and easier than recalculating it every time...)

Things I would like to know:

I like the idea of having the small bar showing at which place in the  
presentations we are (such as in pre-colorful). I'd like it very  
minimal, though: maybe just grey squares, with the current position  
being white or yellow. I have a hunch that this could be achieved  
with \setupinteractionbar, but this command is a bit underdocumented.  
Hints, anybody?

I am still at a loss how to achieve one thing in ConTeXt that was  
pretty easy in Keynote or (shudder) Powerpoint: When I wanted to  
highlight something on a map or a picture, I would just draw a red  
circle around it. What would be the proper way to do this in ConTeXt?  
Adding a layer with a red circle drawn in Metapost, then positioning  
it by trial and error? Or can anyone point to a better solution?

And lastly: I have never seen transitions working on OS X (both  
Apple's Preview and Adobe Reader 7.0). Can anybody confirm that they  
got this working on other systems?

Sorry for the long post. I'm hoping for some enlightenment.

Best

Thomas

Re: presentations in ConTeXt

[Mojca Miklavec]

On 5/23/05, Thomas A. Schmitz <thomas.schmitz@uni-bonn.de> wrote:

> I am still at a loss how to achieve one thing in ConTeXt that was
> pretty easy in Keynote or (shudder) Powerpoint: When I wanted to
> highlight something on a map or a picture, I would just draw a red
> circle around it. What would be the proper way to do this in ConTeXt?
> Adding a layer with a red circle drawn in Metapost, then positioning
> it by trial and error? Or can anyone point to a better solution?

What kind of picture do you have? If you have .jpg/.png/..., you can
get (x,y) position of the pixel where the center of circle should be.

One possibility is to create a new metapost figure and draw the circle
on it using the measured coordinates:

(This circles the blue tulip on
http://contextgarden.net/images/6/65/Kochloewe_c.jpg.)

\setupcolors[state=start]
\starttext
\startuseMPgraphic{CircleBlueTulip}
	% center point
	pair size, c;
	% figure will be 10 cm wide
	scale := 10cm/400;
	
	% center of the blue tulip is on (219,333), image is 400*460
	size := (400,460) scaled scale;
	c := (222,460-330) scaled scale;
	% diameter of the circle should be 50 pixels
	d := 50scale;

	pickup pencircle scaled 2pt;

	externalfigure "Kochloewe_c.jpg" xyscaled size;
	draw fullcircle scaled d shifted c withcolor red;
\stopuseMPgraphic

\useMPgraphic{CircleBlueTulip}

\stoptext

I believe there exists a more straightforward way if you make
uniqueMPgraphic and specify coordinate fractions of the circle to be
drawn, but if you say:

\framed[background=SomeGraphicWithACircle]{\externalfigure[Kochloewe_c][width=10cm]},
the circle (if any) is drawn behind the figure and cannot be used as
such. Unless you specify the figure in a new layer and draw both
layers in the proper order.

In this case it would be fine to have a \framed[...foreground=...] command :)

> And lastly: I have never seen transitions working on OS X (both
> Apple's Preview and Adobe Reader 7.0). Can anybody confirm that they
> got this working on other systems?

They work in Windows XP (I'n not sure if they're also working using
ConTeXt commands). But they are so ugly that you don't want to use
them.

Mojca

Re: presentations in ConTeXt

[Vit Zyka]

Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On 5/23/05, Thomas A. Schmitz <thomas.schmitz@uni-bonn.de> wrote:
> 
> 
>>I am still at a loss how to achieve one thing in ConTeXt that was
>>pretty easy in Keynote or (shudder) Powerpoint: When I wanted to
>>highlight something on a map or a picture, I would just draw a red
>>circle around it. What would be the proper way to do this in ConTeXt?
>>Adding a layer with a red circle drawn in Metapost, then positioning
>>it by trial and error? Or can anyone point to a better solution?
> 
> 
> What kind of picture do you have? If you have .jpg/.png/..., you can
> get (x,y) position of the pixel where the center of circle should be.
> 
> One possibility is to create a new metapost figure and draw the circle
> on it using the measured coordinates:
> 
> (This circles the blue tulip on
> http://contextgarden.net/images/6/65/Kochloewe_c.jpg.)
> 
> \setupcolors[state=start]
> \starttext
> \startuseMPgraphic{CircleBlueTulip}
> 	% center point
> 	pair size, c;
> 	% figure will be 10 cm wide
> 	scale := 10cm/400;
> 	
> 	% center of the blue tulip is on (219,333), image is 400*460
> 	size := (400,460) scaled scale;
> 	c := (222,460-330) scaled scale;
> 	% diameter of the circle should be 50 pixels
> 	d := 50scale;
> 
> 	pickup pencircle scaled 2pt;
> 
> 	externalfigure "Kochloewe_c.jpg" xyscaled size;
> 	draw fullcircle scaled d shifted c withcolor red;
> \stopuseMPgraphic
> 
> \useMPgraphic{CircleBlueTulip}
> 
> \stoptext
> 
> I believe there exists a more straightforward way if you make
> uniqueMPgraphic and specify coordinate fractions of the circle to be
> drawn, but if you say:
> 
> \framed[background=SomeGraphicWithACircle]{\externalfigure[Kochloewe_c][width=10cm]},
> the circle (if any) is drawn behind the figure and cannot be used as
> such. Unless you specify the figure in a new layer and draw both
> layers in the proper order.
> 
> In this case it would be fine to have a \framed[...foreground=...] command :)

Use

\framed
   [background={foreground,BgFront}]
   {\externalfigure[Kochloewe_c][width=10cm]}}

Define your picture as BgFront. 'foreground' is fixed word that 
identifies layer 0 (text). So you can stack bacground as follow:
   background={...,MyLayer-2,MyLayer-1,foreground,MyLayer1,MyLayer2,...}

Vit

Re: presentations in ConTeXt

[Mojca Miklavec]

Vit Zyka wrote:
> Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> > Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> >
> >>I am still at a loss how to achieve one thing in ConTeXt that was
> >>pretty easy in Keynote or (shudder) Powerpoint: When I wanted to
> >>highlight something on a map or a picture, I would just draw a red
> >>circle around it. What would be the proper way to do this in ConTeXt?
> >>Adding a layer with a red circle drawn in Metapost, then positioning
> >>it by trial and error? Or can anyone point to a better solution?
> >
...
> > In this case it would be fine to have a \framed[...foreground=...] command :)
> 
> Use
> 
> \framed
>    [background={foreground,BgFront}]
>    {\externalfigure[Kochloewe_c][width=10cm]}}
> 
> Define your picture as BgFront. 'foreground' is fixed word that
> identifies layer 0 (text). So you can stack bacground as follow:
>    background={...,MyLayer-2,MyLayer-1,foreground,MyLayer1,MyLayer2,...}

Uau! Thanks a lot for a very nice hint. So you can make something like that:

\setupcolors[state=start]
\starttext
\setupMPvariables[CircleSomething][dimension={(100,100)},center={(50,50)},r=10]
\startuseMPgraphic{CircleSomething}
	pair dimension, center;
	% TODO: this also has to be passed as parameter!!!
	%       now it stands for: width=10cm
	scale := 10cm/(xpart \MPvar{dimension});
	picture bboxpicture;

	dimension := \MPvar{dimension} scaled scale;
	center := \MPvar{center} scaled scale;
	r := \MPvar{r}*scale;

	pickup pencircle scaled 2pt;

	% proper bounding box
	fill unitsquare xyscaled dimension;
	bboxpicture := currentpicture;
	currentpicture := nullpicture;
	
	draw fullcircle scaled (2*r) shifted center withcolor red;
	setbounds currentpicture to boundingbox bboxpicture;
\stopuseMPgraphic

\defineoverlay[CircleBlueTulip][\uniqueMPgraphic{CircleSomething}{dimension={(400,460)},center={(222,460-330)},r=25}]
\defineoverlay[CircleRedTulip][\useMPgraphic{CircleSomething}{dimension={(400,460)},center={(148,460-330)},r=25}]

\framed[background={foreground,CircleBlueTulip},offset=0pt,strut=no]{\externalfigure[Kochloewe_c][width=10cm]}
\framed[background={foreground,CircleRedTulip},offset=0pt,strut=no]{\externalfigure[Kochloewe_c][width=10cm]}

\stoptext

Mojca

Re: presentations in ConTeXt

[Patrick Gundlach]

Some time ago, Mojca Miklavec <mojca.miklavec.lists@gmail.com> wrote:

> Uau! Thanks a lot for a very nice hint. So you can make something like that:
>
--------------------------------------------------
 \setupcolors[state=start]
 \starttext
 \setupMPvariables[CircleSomething][dimension={(100,100)},center={(50,50)},r=10]
 \startuseMPgraphic{CircleSomething}
 	pair dimension, center;
 	% TODO: this also has to be passed as parameter!!!
 	%       now it stands for: width=10cm
 	scale := 10cm/(xpart \MPvar{dimension});
 	picture bboxpicture;

 	dimension := \MPvar{dimension} scaled scale;
 	center := \MPvar{center} scaled scale;
 	r := \MPvar{r}*scale;

 	pickup pencircle scaled 2pt;

 	% proper bounding box
 	fill unitsquare xyscaled dimension;
 	bboxpicture := currentpicture;
 	currentpicture := nullpicture;
 	
 	draw fullcircle scaled (2*r) shifted center withcolor red;
 	setbounds currentpicture to boundingbox bboxpicture;
 \stopuseMPgraphic

 \defineoverlay[CircleBlueTulip][\uniqueMPgraphic{CircleSomething}{dimension={(400,460)},center={(222,460-330)},r=25}]
 \defineoverlay[CircleRedTulip][\useMPgraphic{CircleSomething}{dimension={(400,460)},center={(148,460-330)},r=25}]

 \framed[background={foreground,CircleBlueTulip},offset=0pt,strut=no]{\externalfigure[Kochloewe_c][width=10cm]}
 \framed[background={foreground,CircleRedTulip},offset=0pt,strut=no]{\externalfigure[Kochloewe_c][width=10cm]}

 \stoptext
--------------------------------------------------

So, do you get any real output (besides the image)? I cannot see any
circles in the pdf.


ConTeXt  ver: 2005.06.07  fmt: 2005.6.7  int: english  mes: english


Patrick

-- 
ConTeXt wiki and more: http://contextgarden.net

Re: Re: presentations in ConTeXt

[Mojca Miklavec]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 389 bytes --]

Patrick Gundlach wrote:
> So, do you get any real output (besides the image)? I cannot see any
> circles in the pdf.
> 
> ConTeXt  ver: 2005.06.07  fmt: 2005.6.7  int: english  mes: english
> 
> Patrick

I get this PDF (page size adapted to 10x11.5 cm) with
not-the-very-latest-version of ConTeXt.

ConTeXt  ver: 2005.05.30  fmt: 2005.6.13  int: english  mes: english

Mojca

[-- Attachment #2: CircleTheLion.pdf --]
[-- Type: application/pdf, Size: 24624 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: CircleTheLion.tex --]
[-- Type: application/x-tex, Size: 1428 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #4: Type: text/plain, Size: 139 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context

Re: presentations in ConTeXt

[Patrick Gundlach]

Hi Mojca,

> I get this PDF (page size adapted to 10x11.5 cm) with
> not-the-very-latest-version of ConTeXt.

Thanks. There must be something wrong with my setup/version at home.
I'll check again.

Patrick

-- 
ConTeXt wiki and more: http://contextgarden.net

Re: Re: presentations in ConTeXt

[Hans Hagen]

Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Patrick Gundlach wrote:
> 
>>So, do you get any real output (besides the image)? I cannot see any
>>circles in the pdf.
>>
>>ConTeXt  ver: 2005.06.07  fmt: 2005.6.7  int: english  mes: english
>>
>>Patrick
> 
> 
> I get this PDF (page size adapted to 10x11.5 cm) with
> not-the-very-latest-version of ConTeXt.

isn't there some use/unique mix up as well?

Hans


-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
      tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                              | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Re: Re: presentations in ConTeXt

[Willi Egger]

Hans Hagen wrote:
> Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> 
>> Patrick Gundlach wrote:
>>
>>> So, do you get any real output (besides the image)? I cannot see any
>>> circles in the pdf.
>>>
>>> ConTeXt  ver: 2005.06.07  fmt: 2005.6.7  int: english  mes: english
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>
>>
>>
>> I get this PDF (page size adapted to 10x11.5 cm) with
>> not-the-very-latest-version of ConTeXt.
> 
> 
> isn't there some use/unique mix up as well?

I compiled the file attached in Mojca's mail. Except that I do not have 
the Kochloewe_c picture it works. So I get the gray dummy background and 
on each page a red circle. Although there is the mentioned mix up it 
seems not to harm the result. After changing the use of the command it 
still works.
This test was performed with Context january 2005 and Pdfetex ...20a.

Willi

Re: Re: presentations in ConTeXt

[Willi Egger]

Hello,

in additon to the just posted mail I can say, that it works also under 
Context latest and pdfetex ...1.20a


Willi

Hans Hagen wrote:
> Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> 
>> Patrick Gundlach wrote:
>>
>>> So, do you get any real output (besides the image)? I cannot see any
>>> circles in the pdf.
>>>
>>> ConTeXt  ver: 2005.06.07  fmt: 2005.6.7  int: english  mes: english
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>
>>
>>
>> I get this PDF (page size adapted to 10x11.5 cm) with
>> not-the-very-latest-version of ConTeXt.
> 
> 
> isn't there some use/unique mix up as well?
> 
> Hans
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
>               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
>      tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
>                                              | www.pragma-pod.nl
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ntg-context mailing list
> ntg-context@ntg.nl
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context

Re: Re: presentations in ConTeXt

[Mojca Miklavec]

Willi Egger wrote:
> Hans Hagen wrote:
> > Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> >
> >> I get this PDF (page size adapted to 10x11.5 cm) with
> >> not-the-very-latest-version of ConTeXt.
> >
> > isn't there some use/unique mix up as well?

Excuse me, I started with an "unique" graphic and had to change into
"use" graphic as it didn't work. Later on I forgot to change it on one
place, but it worked anyway.

> I compiled the file attached in Mojca's mail. Except that I do not have
> the Kochloewe_c picture it works.

http://contextgarden.net/images/6/65/Kochloewe_c.jpg (the one on the
first page).

Mojca

garden art (was: presentations in ConTeXt)

[Henning Hraban Ramm]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1649 bytes --]

Am 2005-06-28 um 19:25 schrieb Mojca Miklavec:
>> I compiled the file attached in Mojca's mail. Except that I do not  
>> have
>> the Kochloewe_c picture it works.
> http://contextgarden.net/images/6/65/Kochloewe_c.jpg (the one on the
> first page).
BTW this picture was drawn by my former wife for a "ConTeXt cookbook"  
project that rests in peace.
I never could convince her to draw some gardening lions for  
ConTeXtgarden.
At the moment I know noone who can draw and would do it for free (and  
I can't really draw myself).

Any artists here around?
My idea was a lion with watering can (and perhaps an apron) watering  
three tulips (red, black and blue) with a fence (garden!) in the  
background.

You could think of more similar pictures, perhaps featuring  
characters as garden plants, Meta the lioness having Meta-Fun  
(juggling?), lion de-bugging (with insecticide?)...

I don't like the original TeX drawings by Duane Bibby so much, and I  
think we should use a different style for ConTeXt.
I like the cooking lion, but I could image something completely  
different like pragma vector art, oil painting, manga style etc. ;-)
But it should keep a certain quality level, matching ConTeXt itself.
The artwork must not infringe any copyrights, so please don't scan  
anything printed! On the other hand the artist must agree to put her/ 
his work under the GNU free doc license.

I'd really appreciate good artwork for the garden and would be glad  
to help with scanning, cleaning, logo-ing, perhaps animating etc.

Grüßlis vom Hraban!
---
http://www.fiee.net/texnique/
http://contextgarden.net


[-- Attachment #1.2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 2312 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 139 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context

Re: Re: presentations in ConTeXt

[Thomas A. Schmitz]

Mojca,

I think I never actually said thanks for this wonderful trick you  
taught us! It's wonderful, and I'm still experimenting with it. For  
the time being, it's still very much trial and error to position the  
circle, but I'll learn. Now I'd be so happy if someone (well I guess  
Hans) could teach me how to have this neat progressbar that's in pre- 
color on my own slides; I don't seem to be able to isolate the code  
that produces it.

Thanks a lot, and all best

Thomas

On Jun 28, 2005, at 4:37 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

> Patrick Gundlach wrote:
>
>> So, do you get any real output (besides the image)? I cannot see any
>> circles in the pdf.
>>
>> ConTeXt  ver: 2005.06.07  fmt: 2005.6.7  int: english  mes: english
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>
> I get this PDF (page size adapted to 10x11.5 cm) with
> not-the-very-latest-version of ConTeXt.
>
> ConTeXt  ver: 2005.05.30  fmt: 2005.6.13  int: english  mes: english
>
> Mojca
>
> <CircleTheLion.pdf>
> <CircleTheLion.tex>
> _______________________________________________
> ntg-context mailing list
> ntg-context@ntg.nl
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
>

Re: Re: presentations in ConTeXt

[Mojca Miklavec]

Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> Now I'd be so happy if someone (well I guess
> Hans) could teach me how to have this neat progressbar that's in pre-
> color on my own slides; I don't seem to be able to isolate the code
> that produces it.

Do you mean those "funny little things" which run from the beginning
to the end as the presentation runs from the first towards the last
slide?

There are "PageNumber" and "NOfPages" variables defined somewhere in
metafun. So you can say something like:

    if(NOfPages > 2) and (PageNumber > 0):
        fraction := (PageNumber-1)/(NOfPages-1)
    else:
        fraction := 1;
    fi;

And then you can do with it whatever you want. You can for example
change slide colour:

    SlideColour := fraction[\MPcolor[my color 1],\MPcolor[my color 2]];

or draw a progress bar:

    fill unisquare xscaled fraction xyscaled size withcolor red;
    draw unitsquare xyscaled size;

An alternative are \pageno and \lastpage, defined inside ConTeXt.

Hope this helps,
    Mojca

Re: Re: presentations in ConTeXt

[Thomas A. Schmitz]

Mojca,

thanks again, that's a useful trick! However, there is a command  
\interactionbar which seems to provide this functionality, and there  
is \setupinteractionbar, but the commands are somewhat  
underdocumented :-)
At least, I don't get any visible output on my slides when I include  
them; there seems to be some kind of secret...

(Your code doesn't compile here, it dies with this message:

This is MetaPost, Version 0.641 (Web2C 7.5.4)
(p-mpgraph.mp
 >> NOfPages-2
! Unknown relation will be considered false.
<to be read again>
                    )
l.118 if(NOfPages > 2)
                        and (PageNumber > 0): fraction :=  
(PageNumber-1)/(NOf...

?

Thanks, and best

Thomas

On Jul 15, 2005, at 9:46 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

> Do you mean those "funny little things" which run from the beginning
> to the end as the presentation runs from the first towards the last
> slide?
>
> There are "PageNumber" and "NOfPages" variables defined somewhere in
> metafun. So you can say something like:
>
>     if(NOfPages > 2) and (PageNumber > 0):
>         fraction := (PageNumber-1)/(NOfPages-1)
>     else:
>         fraction := 1;
>     fi;
>
> And then you can do with it whatever you want. You can for example
> change slide colour:
>
>     SlideColour := fraction[\MPcolor[my color 1],\MPcolor[my color  
> 2]];
>
> or draw a progress bar:
>
>     fill unisquare xscaled fraction xyscaled size withcolor red;
>     draw unitsquare xyscaled size;
>
> An alternative are \pageno and \lastpage, defined inside ConTeXt.
>
> Hope this helps,
>     Mojca
>

Re: Re: presentations in ConTeXt

[Hans Hagen]

Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:

> Mojca,
>
> thanks again, that's a useful trick! However, there is a command  
> \interactionbar which seems to provide this functionality, and there  
> is \setupinteractionbar, but the commands are somewhat  
> underdocumented :-)
> At least, I don't get any visible output on my slides when I include  
> them; there seems to be some kind of secret...
>
> (Your code doesn't compile here, it dies with this message:
>
> This is MetaPost, Version 0.641 (Web2C 7.5.4)
> (p-mpgraph.mp
> >> NOfPages-2
> ! Unknown relation will be considered false.
> <to be read again>
>                    )
> l.118 if(NOfPages > 2)
>                        and (PageNumber > 0): fraction :=  
> (PageNumber-1)/(NOf...
>
> ?
>
> Thanks, and best

if you want access to those variables (some of them only make sense at pag ebuilding time) you need to say: 

  LoadPageState ;

(this is done automatically in StartPage ... StopPage) 

Hans 

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Re: Re: presentations in ConTeXt

[Thomas A. Schmitz]

Thanks Hans! What about a small refresher about \interactionbar cum  
suis. Could you post a minimal example of what is needed to get  
output from it? I tried with a couple of combinations of  
\setupinteraction[state=start] and \setupinteractionbar 
[alternative=d] etc, but I'm not getting any output on my pdf's. I'd  
be very grateful!

Best

Thomas

On Jul 17, 2005, at 11:10 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:

> Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
>
>
>> Mojca,
>>
>> thanks again, that's a useful trick! However, there is a command   
>> \interactionbar which seems to provide this functionality, and  
>> there  is \setupinteractionbar, but the commands are somewhat   
>> underdocumented :-)
>> At least, I don't get any visible output on my slides when I  
>> include  them; there seems to be some kind of secret...
>>
>> (Your code doesn't compile here, it dies with this message:
>>
>> This is MetaPost, Version 0.641 (Web2C 7.5.4)
>> (p-mpgraph.mp
>> >> NOfPages-2
>> ! Unknown relation will be considered false.
>> <to be read again>
>>                    )
>> l.118 if(NOfPages > 2)
>>                        and (PageNumber > 0): fraction :=   
>> (PageNumber-1)/(NOf...
>>
>> ?
>>
>> Thanks, and best
>>
>
> if you want access to those variables (some of them only make sense  
> at pag ebuilding time) you need to say:
>  LoadPageState ;
>
> (this is done automatically in StartPage ... StopPage)
> Hans
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
>              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
>     tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
>                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> ntg-context mailing list
> ntg-context@ntg.nl
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
>

ConTeXt to XML?

[Elena Fraboschi]

Dear all:  Sorry if this question is not appropriate for this forum - I am 
a newbie, I tried to read at least one month's worth of emails, and...

I do not come to this list from the perspective of an author, who can 
afford to give his work huge amounts of time till it is set just right.  I 
come here from the perspective of a publisher/editor (Indiana University 
Mathematics Journal), where the outlook is quite different:  You take
many papers (LaTeX source files), written by people whose expertise ranges 
from spaghetti-TeX to guru-TeX, and you "massage" them to conform to the 
Journal format and to make them look as nice as possible.  (Perfection
remains always on the horizon - you got to meet the printers' deadlines.)

That said by way of introduction, I am contemplating a move for the IUMJ
away from LaTeX to ...  I have two reasons to recommend abandoning LaTeX:
(1) LaTeX's conversion to other formats (excluding PDF) is laborius 
and falls very short of the ideal, and (2) long-term 
archiving and long-term reusability in settings we may not even envisage 
at this time forces me to think XML... XML... XML.

So, I have been delving into ConTeXt, and I like its syntax:  far 
"cleaner" than LaTeX.  I have also read that there is work in progress
to convert XML to ConTeXt --- my question is, any thoughts, hints,
recommendations about reverse-engineering, that is, from ConTeXt to
XML?  If the IUMJ switched production to ConTeXt, we would still want
to preserve on "archival" copy in XML.

(As of now we translate LaTeX to XML using "hermes", but it would
not work with ConTeXt.)  If nothing is contemplated in the
area of *from ConTeXt to XML", might this strategy work

ConTeXt -> pdf - pdf to XML ?

I apologize if the topic is off bounds, and will be grateful if anyone 
decides to think outloud on this subject.  Best, elena

Elena Fraboschi
Indiana University Mathematics Journal

Re: Re: presentations in ConTeXt

[Hans Hagen]

Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:

> Thanks Hans! What about a small refresher about \interactionbar cum  
> suis. Could you post a minimal example of what is needed to get  
> output from it? I tried with a couple of combinations of  
> \setupinteraction[state=start] and \setupinteractionbar 
> [alternative=d] etc, but I'm not getting any output on my pdf's. I'd  
> be very grateful!

there are some examples or usage in the presentation styles

>grep interactionbar s-pre*
s-pre-01.tex:%D   {interactionbar}
s-pre-01.tex:       {\interactionbar[alternative=f,width=.5\makeupwidth,height=1
ex]}
s-pre-01.tex:%D   {setupinteractionbar, interactionbuttons}
s-pre-01.tex:\setupinteractionbar
s-pre-04.tex:%D   {setupinteractionbar}
s-pre-04.tex:\setupinteractionbar
s-pre-04.tex:  [\interactionbar]
s-pre-04.tex:%D    setupbackgrounds,setupinteraction,setupinteractionbar,
s-pre-04.tex:   \setupinteractionbar[state=stop]
s-pre-04.tex:   \setupinteractionbar[state=start]
s-pre-05.tex:   \setupinteractionbar[state=stop]
s-pre-05.tex:   \setupinteractionbar[state=start]

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Re: ConTeXt to XML?

[Brooks Moses]

At 09:18 AM 7/19/2005, Elena Fraboschi <elena@mendoza.math.indiana.edu> wrote:
>So, I have been delving into ConTeXt, and I like its syntax:  far 
>"cleaner" than LaTeX.  I have also read that there is work in progress
>to convert XML to ConTeXt --- my question is, any thoughts, hints,
>recommendations about reverse-engineering, that is, from ConTeXt to
>XML?  If the IUMJ switched production to ConTeXt, we would still want
>to preserve on "archival" copy in XML.

I'm reminded of a presentation that Kaveh Bazargan (from River Valley 
Technologies) gave at the PracticalTeX 2004 conference on a LaTeX/XML 
process they use, but unfortunately he hasn't provided any paper to go with 
his presentation.

One of the things, though, that I specifically remember was that, since 
they also were archiving XML, their process specifically converted the 
authors' LaTeX to XML (specifically with the mathematics in MathML, rather 
than as embedded LaTeX as I know some publishers do), and then converted 
that from XML back to LaTeX and thence to PDF (or Postscript, possibly) for 
actual production -- thus guaranteeing that the archival XML would in fact 
reproduce the production versions exactly.

With a workflow like that, I'm not certain how much conversion from ConTeXt 
to XML will be necessary -- you'll probably, at least for the time being, 
still be getting author submissions in LaTeX.  You could then convert that 
to XML using a version of your present process, adjust the XML as needed to 
fit your standards, archive the XML, and then dump the XML into an 
automated sort of process that converts it to ConTeXt and thence to PDF, 
html, and whatever else you need.

The only requirement, then, is that the XML -> ConTeXt -> PDF workflow not 
involve any manual adjustments to the ConTeXt code -- all manual changes 
would need to be made in the XML.  (That may be a good idea anyway, as it 
guarantees that the XML is always the "true" version.)

>(As of now we translate LaTeX to XML using "hermes", but it would
>not work with ConTeXt.)  If nothing is contemplated in the
>area of *from ConTeXt to XML", might this strategy work
>
>ConTeXt -> pdf - pdf to XML ?

I suspect that, insofar as it worked, you'd probably lose most of the 
metadata (this is a section header, this is a subsection header, etc.) 
unless it was a PDF to XML converter that was very specific to your 
particular PDF files.

...

On a different note, it may be worth pointing out that ConTeXt's support 
for typesetting of complicated equations -- that is, the sort of stuff for 
which one really wants the AMSmath package in LaTeX -- really isn't 
especially great; it's pretty much limited to the capabilities of Plain 
TeX.  I'm currently working (very slowly) on trying to improve this by 
doing a port of AMSmath to ConTeXt, but I have no idea how compatible that 
will be with ConTeXt's MathML/XML support, nor when I'd have it to a point 
where it would be ready for production work.

The other alternative I know of for doing math in XML is embedding bits of 
LaTeX code within the XML.  Since most "conversion to non-PDF formats" 
involves converting the math to bitmap images anyway (or, at least, any 
conversion to HTML for the web does!), I don't think that's really 
complicating things much.  It's certainly possible in theory to embed 
LaTeX-coded equations in ConTeXt, and there's a small bit of comment on 
this on the Wiki.  In practice, it may take a bit of coding to make work, 
but the amount won't be excessive.

...

And, on yet a third note, you might find it useful to talk to Steve 
Grathwohl at the Duke University Press -- he was also at the PracticalTeX 
2004 conference, and had clearly "caught the ConTeXt bug", and I suspect he 
may well have some useful practical experience in this area.

- Brooks

Re: Re: presentations in ConTeXt

[Thomas A. Schmitz]

Thanks again, Hans! I just figured out how to do it by experimenting  
with s-pre-01.tex. The key was

\setuplayout[bottom=12pt] % or some dimension

Without it, I'd get no bar, but now it works, and it looks just  
amazing! I'm looking forward to my next presentation!!

Best

Thomas


On Jul 19, 2005, at 8:23 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:

>
> there are some examples or usage in the presentation styles
>
>
>> grep interactionbar s-pre*
>>
> s-pre-01.tex:%D   {interactionbar}
> s-pre-01.tex:       {\interactionbar[alternative=f,width=.5 
> \makeupwidth,height=1
> ex]}
> s-pre-01.tex:%D   {setupinteractionbar, interactionbuttons}
> s-pre-01.tex:\setupinteractionbar
> s-pre-04.tex:%D   {setupinteractionbar}
> s-pre-04.tex:\setupinteractionbar
> s-pre-04.tex:  [\interactionbar]
> s-pre-04.tex:%D     
> setupbackgrounds,setupinteraction,setupinteractionbar,
> s-pre-04.tex:   \setupinteractionbar[state=stop]
> s-pre-04.tex:   \setupinteractionbar[state=start]
> s-pre-05.tex:   \setupinteractionbar[state=stop]
> s-pre-05.tex:   \setupinteractionbar[state=start]
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
>              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
>     tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
>                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> ntg-context mailing list
> ntg-context@ntg.nl
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
>

Re: ConTeXt to XML?

[Hans Hagen]

Brooks Moses wrote:

> On a different note, it may be worth pointing out that ConTeXt's 
> support for typesetting of complicated equations -- that is, the sort 
> of stuff for which one really wants the AMSmath package in LaTeX -- 
> really isn't especially great; it's pretty much limited to the 
> capabilities of Plain TeX.  I'm currently working (very slowly) on 
> trying to improve this by doing a port of AMSmath to ConTeXt, but I 
> have no idea how compatible that will be with ConTeXt's MathML/XML 
> support, nor when I'd have it to a point where it would be ready for 
> production work.
>
> The other alternative I know of for doing math in XML is embedding 
> bits of LaTeX code within the XML.  Since most "conversion to non-PDF 
> formats" involves converting the math to bitmap images anyway (or, at 
> least, any conversion to HTML for the web does!), I don't think that's 
> really complicating things much.  It's certainly possible in theory to 
> embed LaTeX-coded equations in ConTeXt, and there's a small bit of 
> comment on this on the Wiki.  In practice, it may take a bit of coding 
> to make work, but the amount won't be excessive.

there is a math module (m-math) and a new implementation of that (m-newmat) which does quite some ams math; 

i have no problem with adding more code but each time i ask for specs, nothing comes up -) 
 
Hans 

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Re: ConTeXt to XML?

[Hans Hagen]

Elena Fraboschi wrote:

> So, I have been delving into ConTeXt, and I like its syntax:  far 
> "cleaner" than LaTeX.  I have also read that there is work in progress
> to convert XML to ConTeXt --- my question is, any thoughts, hints,
> recommendations about reverse-engineering, that is, from ConTeXt to
> XML?  If the IUMJ switched production to ConTeXt, we would still want
> to preserve on "archival" copy in XML.
>
> (As of now we translate LaTeX to XML using "hermes", but it would
> not work with ConTeXt.)  If nothing is contemplated in the
> area of *from ConTeXt to XML", might this strategy work

There are several things involved in such a translation

- the general structure, this is not that hard and can easily be scripted
- special characters, also easy to script
- special markup, like math, chemistry etc

concerning math, one can use:

- content mathml, which is very structured and configurable
- presentation mathml, which looks like tex, and does not always lead to 
nice looking output
- embedded tex, which is ok

as a start one can consider "structure in xml and embedded tex for 
formulas",  its not that hard to generate web pages from that

i'm considering adding open math support (needed for a project)

> ConTeXt -> pdf - pdf to XML ?

the best way is:

xml -> context
xml -> html
xml -> anything

normally magazines are not that complex so oen can use context's direct 
mapping; depending on the amount of manipulations, one can

xml -> context reading xml -> pdf
xml -> xslt -> xml -> context reading xml -> pdf
xml -> xslt -> context code -> context reading tex -> pdf

in any case, try to cut the problem into small parts and find solutions 
for that; so far i never ran into things/demands that could not be solved

> I apologize if the topic is off bounds, and will be grateful if anyone 
> decides to think outloud on this subject.  Best, elena

no problem, if you want to know more you can either use this list (it 
could also be a nice thread for those who want to do similar things)

if you don't want to bother the list., you may also mail me directly

pdf is pages while xml is structured markup, so converting pdf into xml 
is non trivial,

(btw, the dutch math societies journal is made up in context, i.e. non 
standard layout (2/3 columns, grayscales, two non cm font sets, 
graphics, pictures etc; the main reason why we now have the columnsets 
mechanism-)

Hans

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Re: ConTeXt to XML?

[Hans Hagen]

Hi Elena

Concerning the math and xml, it all depends on what kind of math is 
used. In most cases some tex -> presentation mathml results in sub 
optimal results. One of the advantages of context is that one can 
easilly modulate on layouts, so for publishing on the web one can as 
well use pdf in a more screen/navigation friendly layout. It's no real 
problem to generate multiple instances from one document using 
processing modes.  That  way you get quality on paper and on screen.


Hans

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Re: ConTeXt to XML?

[Brooks Moses]

At 01:40 PM 7/19/2005, you wrote:
>Brooks Moses wrote:
>>The other alternative I know of for doing math in XML is embedding bits 
>>of LaTeX code within the XML.  Since most "conversion to non-PDF formats" 
>>involves converting the math to bitmap images anyway (or, at least, any 
>>conversion to HTML for the web does!), I don't think that's really 
>>complicating things much.  It's certainly possible in theory to embed 
>>LaTeX-coded equations in ConTeXt, and there's a small bit of comment on 
>>this on the Wiki.  In practice, it may take a bit of coding to make work, 
>>but the amount won't be excessive.
>
>there is a math module (m-math) and a new implementation of that 
>(m-newmat) which does quite some ams math;

It does some, yes, though not (yet) the multiline alignment parts that I need.

>i have no problem with adding more code but each time i ask for specs, 
>nothing comes up -)

Yeah, I know.  The specs for what I need are "I've got this pile of 
equations written in LaTeX with the AMSmath package, and I'd like to be 
able to copy them back and forth between LaTeX and ConTeXt without needing 
to edit them."  I'm slowly working on reducing that to something that's 
actually useful as specifications (and as some code), and I hope to get 
some of that to you within the next few months or so.

- Brooks

Help with interaction

[luigi.scarso]

Hi, I would like that whan i click over 'Bho' at page 1
I go to page 2 and see the title Bho

\setupinteraction[state=start, focus=width]
\starttext
\about[etichetta]
\page
\section[etichetta]{Bho}
\input tufte
\stoptext

This piece of latex does the thing I want
%%% latex
\documentclass[a4paper, 12pt]{article}
\usepackage[bookmarks=false, pdfstartview=FitH, pdfview=FitH]{hyperref}
\usepackage{nameref}
\begin{document}
\nameref{etichetta}
\clearpage
\section{Bho}\label{etichetta}
\input{tufte}
\end{document}
%%%%

thanks
luigi

Re: ConTeXt to XML?

[Hans Hagen]

Brooks Moses wrote:

> At 01:40 PM 7/19/2005, you wrote:
>
>> Brooks Moses wrote:
>>
>>> The other alternative I know of for doing math in XML is embedding 
>>> bits of LaTeX code within the XML.  Since most "conversion to 
>>> non-PDF formats" involves converting the math to bitmap images 
>>> anyway (or, at least, any conversion to HTML for the web does!), I 
>>> don't think that's really complicating things much.  It's certainly 
>>> possible in theory to embed LaTeX-coded equations in ConTeXt, and 
>>> there's a small bit of comment on this on the Wiki.  In practice, it 
>>> may take a bit of coding to make work, but the amount won't be 
>>> excessive.
>>
>>
>> there is a math module (m-math) and a new implementation of that 
>> (m-newmat) which does quite some ams math;
>
>
> It does some, yes, though not (yet) the multiline alignment parts that 
> I need.

ok, so just isolate the code that you want to be included

>> i have no problem with adding more code but each time i ask for 
>> specs, nothing comes up -)
>
>
> Yeah, I know.  The specs for what I need are "I've got this pile of 
> equations written in LaTeX with the AMSmath package, and I'd like to 
> be able to copy them back and forth between LaTeX and ConTeXt without 
> needing to edit them."  I'm slowly working on reducing that to 
> something that's actually useful as specifications (and as some code), 
> and I hope to get some of that to you within the next few months or so.

Ok,  maybe we can also make a small manual then -)


Hans

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Re: Help with interaction

[luigi.scarso]

luigi.scarso wrote:

> Hi, I would like that whan i click over 'Bho' at page 1
> I go to page 2 and see the title Bho
>
> \setupinteraction[state=start, focus=width]
> \starttext
> \about[etichetta]
> \page
> \section[etichetta]{Bho}
> \input tufte
> \stoptext
>
> This piece of latex does the thing I want
> %%% latex
> \documentclass[a4paper, 12pt]{article}
> \usepackage[bookmarks=false, pdfstartview=FitH, pdfview=FitH]{hyperref}
> \usepackage{nameref}
> \begin{document}
> \nameref{etichetta}
> \clearpage
> \section{Bho}\label{etichetta}
> \input{tufte}
> \end{document}
> %%%%
>
> thanks
> luigi
> _______________________________________________ 

If I use
\setupinteraction[state=start, focus=minwidth]

I have
! Undefined control sequence.
<argument> \v!minwidth


To work\unprotect
\def\dosetuppageview#1% watch the v-h swapping here
  {\processaction
     [#1]
     [       \v!fit=>\def\PDFpageviewkey  {fit}\def\PDFpageviewwrd{/Fit},
           \v!width=>\def\PDFpageviewkey {fith}\def\PDFpageviewwrd{/FitH},
          \v!height=>\def\PDFpageviewkey {fitv}\def\PDFpageviewwrd{/FitV},
        minwidth=>\def\PDFpageviewkey{fitbh}\def\PDFpageviewwrd{/FitBH},
       minheight=>\def\PDFpageviewkey{fitbv}\def\PDFpageviewwrd{/FitBV},
        standard=>\def\PDFpageviewkey{xyz 
\PDFpagexyzspec}\def\PDFpageviewwrd{/XYZ \PDFpagexyzspec},
         \s!unknown=>\def\PDFpageviewkey  {fit}\def\PDFpageviewwrd{/Fit}]%
   \edef\PDFpageview{/View [\PDFpageviewwrd]}}
\protect