From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/26336 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Mojca Miklavec" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Font question mfonts.pdf manual Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 03:23:05 +0100 Message-ID: <6faad9f00603131823v6df01bafg12bb9f1f29160790@mail.gmail.com> References: <4415AFD3.4040500@cs.com> <4415CC8B.5050100@wxs.nl> <4415EC5B.1000105@cs.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1142303273 19952 80.91.229.2 (14 Mar 2006 02:27:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 02:27:53 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Mar 14 03:27:49 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FIzGH-0005Xr-1z for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 03:27:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F321127D0; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 03:27:46 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 20293-04; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 03:27:46 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F71127CF; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 03:23:24 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5EC127CF for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 03:23:22 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 19124-08-3 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 03:23:06 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.195]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F9F7127CB for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 03:23:06 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id n28so33516nfc for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:23:06 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.48.239.5 with SMTP id m5mr1259604nfh; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:23:05 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.48.202.1 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:23:05 -0800 (PST) Original-To: "mailing list for ConTeXt users" In-Reply-To: <4415EC5B.1000105@cs.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:26336 Archived-At: WN wrote: > I use a lot of mathematics i.e a lot of integral symbols (\oint, \oiint, > \oiiint ) for my documentation. > I could not find the corresponding Context math symbols. I suppose they are > not defined as yet ? No, they are not. I already noticed this question last time, but didn't know how to answer it. The main problem is that not only the symbols: not even the proper font is defined. \oiint resides in "pxexa" font, which is mapped to Palatino-Math-Extension-A, but that font is not mapped any further. It would be nice to "define" (copy definitions from LaTeX) those amsmath symbols once anyway (probably the first time when someone will need them). An example of such a definition would be: \definemathsymbol [boxdot] [bin] [ma] ["00] (copied from \re@DeclareMathSymbol{\boxdot}{\mathbin}{AMSa}{0} in pxfonts.sty) After that you can use $\boxdot$. But this font is mapped to "ma", while I have no idea which steps are needed to do the same for "Math-Extension-A" fonts. In order to make yout integral signs work, you have to ask Adam/Taco/Hans for font definitions first. After that you will need the following two definitions: \definemathsymbol [oiintop] [op] [m?] ["10] \definemathsymbol [oiiintop] [op] [m?] ["51] \definemathcommand [oiint] {\oiintop\nolimits} \definemathcommand [oiiint] {\oiiintop\nolimits} [Second part of the mail removed ...] Mojca PS for Hans: regarding the math definitions: are the two functions general enough to deserve two lines in math-tex? \definemathcommand [erf] [nolop] {\mfunction{erf}} \definemathcommand [erfc] [nolop] {\mfunction{erfc}}