From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/26990 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Mojca Miklavec" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: sorting, again Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 20:42:54 +0200 Message-ID: <6faad9f00604091142h7cbbaebdtaa76d22d7f31e83e@mail.gmail.com> References: <97a06f070604080807i776df73xe47bf541f1bb1672@mail.gmail.com> <4438211E.80803@wxs.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144608197 15599 80.91.229.2 (9 Apr 2006 18:43:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 18:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Taco Hoekwater Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sun Apr 09 20:43:14 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FSesK-0004xC-ED for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 20:43:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5DA127D3; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 20:43:04 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 08074-04-5; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 20:42:59 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E808127CD; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 20:42:59 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A5F127CD for ; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 20:42:58 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 08074-04-4 for ; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 20:42:56 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.191]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id C3394127C4 for ; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 20:42:56 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x37so548547nfc for ; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 11:42:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.49.15.4 with SMTP id s4mr1148881nfi; Sun, 09 Apr 2006 11:42:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.48.223.20 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 11:42:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: "mailing list for ConTeXt users" In-Reply-To: <4438211E.80803@wxs.nl> Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:26990 Archived-At: On 4/8/06, Hans Hagen wrote: > btw, we need to collect such sorting examples in the new context test suite, maybe someone wants to volunteer for that aspect What are the guidelines for naming the test files? I saw the tests which are specific for testing single tex files, but where should "sorting tests" go? I would create some king of "logical" structure as well in this case (Language -> Sorting, Language -> Encodings, Language -> Labels, ... Math -> MathML -> UTF, ... Fonts -> Typescripts, Fonts -> Public Fonts -> LM, ...) since most test files, but I would like to hear Taco's opinion first before starting to mess up everything (or perhaps there should be some little brainstorming for creating such a structure). Mojca