From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/30491 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Mojca Miklavec" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Recapitulating Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:34:21 +0200 Message-ID: <6faad9f00608241634u4ccf4d2aw854667275f97ecd1@mail.gmail.com> References: <3e73596b0608241301o6f6aad1dg37172461694b3231@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1156462484 22749 80.91.229.2 (24 Aug 2006 23:34:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:34:44 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Aug 25 01:34:41 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GGOid-0001hp-6k for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:34:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 537C81FF48; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:34:38 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23964-05; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:34:33 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B9081FF3E; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:34:33 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE68B1FF3E for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:34:28 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 24987-02 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:34:23 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.239]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id F14221FF3D for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:34:22 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s12so649869wxc for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:34:21 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.55.19 with SMTP id d19mr493388aga; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:34:21 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.94.17 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:34:21 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: "mailing list for ConTeXt users" In-Reply-To: <3e73596b0608241301o6f6aad1dg37172461694b3231@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:30491 Archived-At: On 8/24/06, Pepe Barbe wrote: > After jumping through hoops, with some help I managed to get XeTeX > running and using TTF fonts directly with pdfTeX. > > But before I go any further I would like to know what is your opinion > in using one or the other. When researching a bit on XeTeX I read > there were several caveates vs. using pdfTeX with LaTeX. > > Is this the same? In ConTeXt. What can I expect to work and what not? > If TTF can be used with pdfTeX (with some effort) what is the > advantage of using XeTeX with ConTeXt? In contrast to LaTeX where many packages are specifically written for pdfTeX and for pdfTeX only (or dvips and dvips only) and not maintained any more, so you can't use them at all (unless/until someone writes a new XeTeX-specific package, but it's still very unlikely that one could use PSTricks in the near future for example). ConTeXt should be much more transparent to the user in the sense that in most cases you don't really have to care whether you compile a document with pdfTeX or XeTeX (you don't or at least shouldn't need to change your documents at all apart from some font definitions). For me the major drawback until today was that I wasn't able to include figure (now I can do that). Apart from that the only thing that comes to my mind is the usage of (math) fonts in general. XeTeX has not been around for such a long time as pdfTeX, so if you want to set up your own font for math or whatever, you might need slightly more patience. (Latin Modern hasn't been set up yet to work in the same was as it does in pdfTeX for example.) And if you want to use the old TeX fonts, you might come accross some problems with accented letters (XeTeX doesn't know that a certain font is ec-encoded) ... etc. But well ... if you managed to get your favorite fonts working in pdfTeX and if you don't need Vietnamese, Arabic or other exotic letters, scripts or fonts, you don't really need XeTeX. pdfTeX will be considerably imroved pretty soon as well. To conclude it in two sentences: concentrate on content instead. You would have to think twice if you would have to decide between LaTeX and ConTeXt. The difference between documents in pdfTeX and XeTeX is only a matter of a couple of lines in setup, "nothing more". Mojca