From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/31123 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Mojca Miklavec" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: bug?: interaction between columns and background Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:12:47 +0200 Message-ID: <6faad9f00609290912g2bc66be1k62dfee7cd36f4b99@mail.gmail.com> References: <6faad9f00609010042y67066206k3302cd1a50f2c695@mail.gmail.com> <44F7F7A1.6020203@gmx.net> <6faad9f00609010343t3f47164cpa8b68e32efc3f4b5@mail.gmail.com> <451D2794.9070006@wxs.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1159546411 1321 80.91.229.2 (29 Sep 2006 16:13:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:13:31 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Sep 29 18:13:27 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GTKz5-0005c4-7Q for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:13:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE571FEE2; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:13:05 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 14510-04; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:13:00 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36501FEA6; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:12:59 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF671FEA6 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:12:56 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 15886-01-2 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:12:49 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.230]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F1F41FE9C for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:12:48 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s12so946189wxc for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:12:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.72.10 with SMTP id u10mr1704351aga; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:12:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.90.25.15 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:12:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: "mailing list for ConTeXt users" In-Reply-To: <451D2794.9070006@wxs.nl> Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:31123 Archived-At: On 9/29/06, Hans Hagen wrote: > Patrick Gundlach wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > >> I tried it on ConTeXtgarden as well and the problem remained (the > >> installed beta was too old there as well). So it's definitely > >> Patrick's fault! ;)) > >> > > > > If you want, I can run the 'installcontext' script more often > > (currently i check for a new ConTeXt version only once a day). > > > normally thats enough buth currently we have more betas due to a reimplementation of the figure analysis macros and mp to pdf converter > > Hans Hey! Wait a minute! I was hoping that you would understand that it was only a joke (didn't it sound ironic enough?). It is definitely *NOT* Patrick's fault, but I needed some sort of excuse ;) I don't belive that running installation script more often that once per day is needed. Betas are something special anyway, it might mean that something is broken there anyway. So if it is slightly more or slightly less broken it doesn't make that much difference, really. (And in any case you loose some intermediate versions released on the same day, unless you restructure all the folders - I doubt that it is worth it.) Mojca PS for Patrick: I take my word back that you should have a filter for your name activated in the inbox. If I meant it seriously, I would send CC to you ;)