From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/32230 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Mojca Miklavec" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: License stuff for ConTeXt Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:37:55 +0100 Message-ID: <6faad9f00612220637u65e7efd1obdde2a76c7a137f1@mail.gmail.com> References: <20061219180411.GC10246@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <20061222100720.GK9611@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <86r6usnrze.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <20061222134613.GB30116@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1166798297 19232 80.91.229.10 (22 Dec 2006 14:38:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 14:38:17 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Dec 22 15:38:16 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GxlXL-0004bC-OO for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:38:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D761FF77; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:36:58 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 05734-03-16; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:36:51 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E1920147; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:36:51 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B48CF20188 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:36:47 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 05734-03-15 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:36:40 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 005771FF77 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:36:39 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l37so3020414nfc for ; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 06:37:56 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.49.58.13 with SMTP id l13mr11877563nfk.1166798276093; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 06:37:56 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.48.209.2 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 06:37:55 -0800 (PST) Original-To: "mailing list for ConTeXt users" In-Reply-To: <20061222134613.GB30116@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:32230 Archived-At: On 12/22/06, Norbert Preining wrote: > Hi all! > > You know what is coming ... > > First statement: I would prefer to have context in Debian proper, but if > we cannot get anyway with this, putting all the stuff into the nonfree > section might be an option, although it doesn't sound right. > > Ok, I made a list of files in the for zips and took a look. Now it would > be nice to have statements from the respective people about the license: > Please see included stuff: > ... > > cont-fnt contains a huge bunch of vf/afm/tfm/map files. I assume that > they were generated from some fontinst source, but this is missing. Hans will know that better, but if you're talking about cont-fnt I assume that all these files were created with texfont. afm files contain a header like: Comment Converted at Fri Mar 18 12:57:24 2005 by ttf2afm from font file `arial.ttf' (I guess that texfont calls ttf2afm in that case) map files contain: % This file is generated by the TeXFont Perl script. ConTeXt doesn't use/need fontinst. I assume that all the files were created only once by running texfont script once per each font/encoding, most probably manually (although one could easily reconstruct the ten lines needed to do the conversion). But I don't know whether the fact that one needs a commercial font in order to create and use those supporting files matters or not. > Anyway, there is no accompanying readme or whatsoever besides the one > for lucida. > > ----------------------------------- > > cont-ext seems to be ok besides a few points: > t-lettrine.tex does not have a license statement > t-urwgaramond, type-urwgaramond, type-urwgothic: no license > statement > A different thing is that the sources of many doc are not included: > ./doc/context/third/bnf/t-bnf.pdf NOSOURCE > ./doc/context/third/chromato/chromato-demo.pdf NOSOURCE > ./doc/context/third/chromato/chromato-doc.pdf NOSOURCE > ./doc/context/third/cmscbf/cmscbf-demo.pdf NOSOURCE > ./doc/context/third/cmscbf/cmscbf-doc.pdf NOSOURCE > ./doc/context/third/cmttbf/cmttbf-demo.pdf NOSOURCE > ./doc/context/third/cmttbf/cmttbf-doc.pdf NOSOURCE > ./doc/context/third/construction-plan/construction-plan-demo.pdf NOSOURCE > ./doc/context/third/construction-plan/construction-plan-doc.pdf NOSOURCE > ./doc/context/third/degrade/degrade-demo.pdf NOSOURCE > ./doc/context/third/degrade/degrade-doc.pdf NOSOURCE > ./doc/context/third/french/french-demo.pdf NOSOURCE > ./doc/context/third/french/french-doc.pdf NOSOURCE > ./doc/context/third/typearea/typearea-demo.pdf NOSOURCE > ./doc/context/third/typearea/typearea-doc.pdf NOSOURCE > > So I would have to put them in something like context-nonfree (like > other context documentation) No. All those are all automatically generated from t-whatever.tex. For example, to get french-demo.pdf you need to run texexec --mode=demo t-french.tex and to get french-doc you need to run texexec --module t-french.tex But now my question: when I process the document with "--module" (with texexec.pl and pre-historic version of ConTeXt from april, if that's relevant ;), I get a whole-page MP graphic on the first page. How are the modulename-doc created? Are there any metapost-related settings disabled or has the behavior of texexec changed in the meantime? Mojca