From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/38699 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Mojca Miklavec" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: latest release(s) and XeTeX Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:40:38 +0100 Message-ID: <6faad9f00801191540y5f6c65b9wa1afddb31bf93bdb@mail.gmail.com> References: <5CA5C105-0998-49BC-BA92-C7AC341AE88E@uni-bonn.de> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1200786127 31441 80.91.229.12 (19 Jan 2008 23:42:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:42:07 +0000 (UTC) To: "mailing list for ConTeXt users" Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sun Jan 20 00:42:25 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JGNKT-000478-Fl for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:42:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BBC51FB71; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:42:00 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 06632-06; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:41:19 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3D31FB0A; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:41:19 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D251FB01 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:41:18 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 18068-01-5 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:40:42 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.186]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311A11FB0A for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:40:40 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k15so1386195rvb.14 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:40:38 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.142.246.8 with SMTP id t8mr2738023wfh.220.1200786038704; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:40:38 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.143.173.8 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:40:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5CA5C105-0998-49BC-BA92-C7AC341AE88E@uni-bonn.de> Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:38699 Archived-At: On Jan 19, 2008 6:05 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: > Is anybody using XeTeX with the latest releases? Even the most basical > "Hello World" document doesn't compile with this error (both stable > and beta, regardless if the document actually uses Latin Modern or > not). Any hints? The new beta has been turned into stable slightly too soon. (Hans has added support for the new filenames of LM before they were even released - in LuaTeX there are synonyms, but XeTeX is "broken" at the moment if you don't have those fonts.) If you have rsync on your computer, the fastest way to resolve the problems would be to call rsync -av rsync://contextgarden.net/minimals/current/fonts/new/fonts/opentype/public/lm/ folder-with-otf-lm and then mktexlsr. (XeLaTeX didn't even consider those changes, I'm affraid. It's a serious problem since the changes need to be synchronized, and I'm afraid of *many* XeTeX users complainig very soon ...) But some new LM filenames are really weird (lmromanslant10-regular.otf and others). I hope that they will change at least a few of them to something more sensible (for the sake of compatibility the best thing to do would be not changing them at all). Size feature and some grouping has been added to all of these fonts, so the names/usage in GUI applications or in XeTeX (when called by name) will change as well. Mojca ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________