From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/39352 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Mojca Miklavec" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Font question Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 14:08:48 +0100 Message-ID: <6faad9f00803020508o34df876eoa618557a595220b1@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080229194224.GB18957@atos.labs.wmid.amu.edu.pl> <47C87116.4080209@wxs.nl> <20080229223120.GA26535@atos.labs.wmid.amu.edu.pl> <47C88DDA.5080805@wxs.nl> <20080301001723.GA13362@atos.labs.wmid.amu.edu.pl> <20080302084819.GA9960@atos.labs.wmid.amu.edu.pl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204463414 29696 80.91.229.12 (2 Mar 2008 13:10:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 13:10:14 +0000 (UTC) To: "mailing list for ConTeXt users" Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sun Mar 02 14:10:40 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JVnxd-00027d-12 for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 14:10:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62761FBC1; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 14:10:03 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 04729-02-4; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 14:09:23 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5D41FB5B; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 14:09:23 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBBD81FB57 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 14:09:21 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 02824-03-12 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 14:08:50 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.169]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA681FB7F for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 14:08:49 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so5938168wfg.5 for ; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 05:08:48 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.142.222.21 with SMTP id u21mr8324995wfg.231.1204463328264; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 05:08:48 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.143.173.8 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 05:08:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20080302084819.GA9960@atos.labs.wmid.amu.edu.pl> Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:39352 Archived-At: On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Marcin Borkowski wrote: > (And I really don't know what advantages in terms of XML I would get...) About 10 times easier to write definitions to "transform" XML into a valid ConTeXt document (to write definitions in such a way that ConTeXt will "understand" the XML) ... But it's true that XML parsing is not 100% stable yet. Mojca ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________