From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/40021 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Mojca Miklavec" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: first steps Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 22:36:05 +0200 Message-ID: <6faad9f00804091336p3177d0b4v8539cb4cf6d492a4@mail.gmail.com> References: <47FA4E9F.12200.32C6D8@wwl.musensturm.de> <6faad9f00804081451o779e494tb500e06fe1ccc8d2@mail.gmail.com> <47FC74EA.2070509@elvenkind.com> <6faad9f00804090247h1b975c40u5874a3c583c9fe70@mail.gmail.com> <6faad9f00804090252o7b59f2f6tef7310c4114517f@mail.gmail.com> <47FCE608.3070009@wxs.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1207773523 4751 80.91.229.12 (9 Apr 2008 20:38:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 20:38:43 +0000 (UTC) To: "mailing list for ConTeXt users" Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Apr 09 22:39:16 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jjh4a-00033X-Kn for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 22:39:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9201FADF; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 22:38:33 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07582-03-17; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 22:37:59 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED881FB1F; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 22:36:49 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16EA81FA41 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 22:36:44 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07582-03-14 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 22:36:13 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com (yw-out-1718.google.com [74.125.46.155]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500781FCDF for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 22:36:13 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 6so795833ywa.74 for ; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:36:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.150.49.15 with SMTP id w15mr940550ybw.32.1207773365357; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:36:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.150.122.20 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:36:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <47FCE608.3070009@wxs.nl> Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:40021 Archived-At: On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > Mojca Miklavec wrote: > >> Here's a minimal example for Hans & Taco: > >> > >> \usetypescriptfile[type-gyr] > >> > >> \usetypescript[palatino] > >> \setupbodyfont[palatino,12pt] > >> \starttext > >> ab\ccaron > >> \stoptext > > i cannot reproduce the crash/problems on my machine One needs to delete afm files (without using Taco's latest patch). > > The output of XeTeX is to be expected, but I don't know why the map > > file is loaded at all. > > you mean that for xetex map files are loaded? if we can assumt that > xetex users use open type fonts we can avoid that (at some point we can > drop transition from type1/otf) Sure. But there is one thing that I don't understand and needs to be resolved even before adding NEWTEX on top of type-gyr. Why are the Type 1 fonts used at all? If I say \usetyscript[postscript] (no [ec]!!!), why do I get the Type 1 fonts instead of OpenType? Shouldn't a couple of additional definitions with ec/texnansi encoding be rather harmless (i.e. should not influence OpenType fonts)? Mojca ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________