From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/40360 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Mojca Miklavec" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context,gmane.comp.tex.context.devel Subject: Re: [dev-context] New context release Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:56:08 +0200 Message-ID: <6faad9f00804161056w4c67f606r8b2b4c50e4bbcfe2@mail.gmail.com> References: <480622CF.60303@elvenkind.com> <20080416163521.GE6680@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <48062ECB.4020402@wxs.nl> <20080416165559.GJ6680@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <48063115.9000105@wxs.nl> <20080416170815.GM6680@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <20080416172128.GO6680@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208370251 6009 80.91.229.12 (16 Apr 2008 18:24:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:24:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mailing list for ConTeXt users , Hans Hagen , Dev Context , Will Robertson , Jonathan Kew To: "Norbert Preining" Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Apr 16 20:24:07 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JmBtm-0006h1-F3 for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:58:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA241FD4A; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:57:40 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 32304-02-6; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:56:54 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 455A21FC91; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:56:54 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 385841FC16 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:56:53 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 31727-03-14 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:56:19 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com (yw-out-1718.google.com [74.125.46.153]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F751FC91 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:56:19 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 6so1982157ywa.74 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:56:08 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.150.199.21 with SMTP id w21mr506666ybf.60.1208368568312; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:56:08 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.150.122.20 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:56:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20080416172128.GO6680@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:40360 gmane.comp.tex.context.devel:778 Archived-At: On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Norbert Preining wrote: > On Mi, 16 Apr 2008, Norbert Preining wrote: > > - for context/luatex: ok with old and new ones > > - for context/xetex: new ones are necessary True. > > Ok, I will think about updating the lmodern fonts, too, but renaming the > > Hmm, according to Ralf updating the lmodern is a no-go because that > would need euenc/fontspec updates, which would need ... devilish. > (See bugs.debian.org/469437) > > I guess we have to live with this for lenny. And for the next we will > have TL2008 with new xetex/luatex and can ship new context and fonts. > > Or do you have another suggestion??? ConTeXt + XeTeX will be broken without the latest LM fonts. ConTeX + LuaTeX works OK. For XeLaTeX you indeed need to update fontspec, but if you're reluctant to upgrade the rest of XeTeX, a fix of fontspec to support the latest LM fonts is so minor, that it's really not worth having a broken ConTeXt+XeTeX. fontspec might need only a few name fixes, that's all. Maybe Jonathan and Will have something more to say about which version of XeTeX and fontspec might be best to consider to make its way into Debian, but a humble request from my side - please do upgrade LM. (MikTeX has done that already.) Mojca ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________