From: "Mojca Miklavec" <mojca.miklavec.lists@gmail.com>
To: "mailing list for ConTeXt users" <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: Latest beta + LuaTeX
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:58:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6faad9f00807170258v54bd6614xd73839d5061efeca@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <487EFBF8.4090103@gmx.net>
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Peter Rolf wrote:
> Martin Schröder schrieb:
>>
>> 2008/7/16 Peter Rolf <indiego@gmx.net>:
>>>
>>> the results (don't continue to read if you want a happy end):
>>>
>>> pdftex 1.40.3 produces a pdf, that shows no side effects when it's
>>> included by the same version of pdftex (1.40.3).
>>> if i include that pdf with the current 1.40.9-rc1 i get the wrong color
>>> in the transparent area.
>>> mh, who to blame? the producer or the collector?
>>
>> Both. :-{
>>
>> Please open a bug for pdftex at sarovar and be sure to include all
>> relevant files, please.
>>
> mh, just made a 'minimal' example and it looks like this bug is not related
> to png transparency. this wasn't visible in my real world example (only
> transparent areas of the png were affected).
> looks more like a mess of layer priorities to me (just guessing).
>
> context example attached (inclusion.tex is the main file, testpdf.tex is the
> source for the included pdf).
>
> so before i file a bug report, can someone confirm this? i used pdftex
> 1.40.9-rc1 for this test.
I don't see any difference with the latest pdftex and with the one
provided in TeX Live 2007. But I do see a difference when adding
\setupcolors[state=start]
to testpdf.tex. In that case it works, though I have no idea what "no
color enabled" means to ConTeXt - it usually uses black for just about
anything except white. I would not wonder if ConTeXt "forgot" to fill
the background with white, but it's hard to tell.
Mojca
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-17 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-15 20:18 Otared Kavian
2008-07-15 20:26 ` Taco Hoekwater
2008-07-16 12:16 ` Taco Hoekwater
2008-07-16 13:05 ` Peter Rolf
2008-07-16 14:34 ` Taco Hoekwater
2008-07-16 17:48 ` Peter Rolf
2008-07-16 17:57 ` Mojca Miklavec
2008-07-16 18:30 ` Peter Rolf
2008-07-16 18:43 ` Peter Rolf
2008-07-16 18:54 ` Mojca Miklavec
2008-07-16 19:12 ` Peter Rolf
2008-07-16 21:22 ` Martin Schröder
2008-07-17 7:59 ` Peter Rolf
2008-07-17 8:35 ` Peter Rolf
2008-07-17 9:58 ` Mojca Miklavec [this message]
2008-07-17 10:47 ` Peter Rolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6faad9f00807170258v54bd6614xd73839d5061efeca@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mojca.miklavec.lists@gmail.com \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).