From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/46476 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Mojca Miklavec" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: different behavior between xetex and luatex Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:42:20 +0100 Message-ID: <6faad9f00812230042t7325c1dbpf1f310e86352b21@mail.gmail.com> References: <68bfdc900812222026n4903d467qa3d6165d83d0eaa9@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1230021875 28730 80.91.229.12 (23 Dec 2008 08:44:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:44:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jin-Hwan Cho To: "mailing list for ConTeXt users" , "Jonathan Kew" Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Dec 23 09:45:41 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LF2tS-0000sS-Pn for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:45:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4901FCFF; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:44:19 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 25625-02-3; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:42:59 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD531FC01; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:42:59 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51E01FADB for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:42:57 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 25572-04-3 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:42:21 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f20.google.com (mail-bw0-f20.google.com [209.85.218.20]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32061FC01 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:42:20 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by bwz13 with SMTP id 13so6597526bwz.2 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:42:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=WQUvryaaFm+MqZ76ygcsBvbIEUC7sYrR4TSRoiHy4NU=; b=np3hiqXwz3EHTPyIUxc5h3U1B04fMHsrJXjxtKaSySvWjQhZwt7ypdiLMUSHcQTEAG enNlrHPTeC5lxZyDs9hRIk0aqzsUVbSlN6Qlm1h88n00TIYMl6Kcpt4fcfHetsuDp9qT UiSwVOrChG4aCX4xS5LkmFzMuDSZZThWuMZtU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=U9sqa2L10iPCI7lI43IDfYL25ygeYgozhb3psWRq3X/PLkeQl6bWfe0OIxRtZlvnRw mCBK4rtHu95nmFBsOSJaYXfZK6fYUEMUYPzER7shAVkrbLTq2wjyOw/S7agex9s+DcCw c4+yxnuudYqC7uRYoA+lvwBmJ2D5BK9lLHfDU= Original-Received: by 10.223.108.196 with SMTP id g4mr5759067fap.36.1230021740264; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:42:20 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.223.104.202 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:42:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:46476 Archived-At: On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Jonathan Kew wrote: > On 23 Dec 2008, at 04:26, Yue Wang wrote: > >> Hi, all. >> >> I expect different output in xetex and luatex using context. and I >> think the problem is quite serious although I do not speak Turkish. >> in turkish, fi can not be treat as ligatures and I can see luatex >> handle that quite well. however, in xetex, fi are treated as >> ligatures. >> I attach the files and output here. I don't know it is a bug in xetex, >> context or dvipdfmx:( >> >> Yue Wang >> > > I don't know how the ConTeXt+XeTeX font setup works, but I notice > "language=trk" in your file. OpenType language tags are all-uppercase, so I > would have expected this to be "language=TRK". If the proper language system > isn't specified, you will get the default behavior, which includes the "fi" > ligatures. When trk is replaced by TRK it works OK in XeTeX. > In the LuaTeX case, I don't think *any* ligatures are enabled by default, so > the language is irrelevant; notice that there's no "ff" ligature in your > output either, even though this should be expected. LuaTeX (ConTeXt with LuaTeX support) is a bit broken at the moment - the example doesn't compile here, so it's difficult to say anything. Mojca ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________