From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/67047 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans van der Meer Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: \expandoneargafter? Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:36:53 +0100 Message-ID: <706C68F4-A619-4457-86F0-EDADBFEF497E@uva.nl> References: <58EAB5D1-EB46-4ED7-B142-86A10DF92955@uva.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300189025 12816 80.91.229.12 (15 Mar 2011 11:37:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:37:05 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Mar 15 12:37:01 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PzSYf-0001F4-1R for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:37:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A187CAB1C; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:37:00 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 2WkBANY9-RSj; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:36:57 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875BECAB0D; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:36:57 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E30CAB0D for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:36:56 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 3+eOIN0L6sjH for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:36:55 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from filter2-nij.mf.surf.net (filter2-nij.mf.surf.net [195.169.124.153]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8E0CAAE0 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:36:55 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.36]) by filter2-nij.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p2FB7lPc002760 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:07:47 +0100 Original-Received: from elhalyn-ethernet.fritz.box (a82-95-102-36.adsl.xs4all.nl [82.95.102.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2FBar54048438 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:36:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from H.vanderMeer@uva.nl) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=194.109.24.36; country=NL; latitude=52.5000; longitude=5.7500; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=52.5000,5.7500&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 0aEjn7Lw0 - e3e107f9c541 - 20110315 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 195.169.124.153 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:67047 Archived-At: On 15 mrt 2011, at 12:14, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > = > Am 15.03.2011 um 12:10 schrieb Hans van der Meer: > = >> The ConTeXt system macro's used to contain a definition for \expandonear= gafter (see Taco Hoekwater's article on this). What happened with it? It se= ems to have disappeared. A pity because I use it in my macros in several pl= aces. >> = >> ! Undefined control sequence. >> l.3 \expandoneargafter >> \command{\abc} >> = >> Someone who can help? > = > Most of the command in context are now defined as \unexpanded > and because of this the command isn=92t necessary anymore. > = I see. But I used this for my own macros and now I cannot find the definiti= on of \expandoneargafter. \def\comparenumericprefix#1#2{% % remember that #1 (\firstsortelement) has to be expanded first! \comparenumeric{\expandoneargafter\uptodelim{#1}}{\uptodelim{#2}}} Could it be that \expandoneargafter is defined as \expandafter\expandafter\= expandafter? Hans van der Meer ___________________________________________________________________________= ________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to t= he Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-cont= ext webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________= ________