I suppose because

(1) The word 'breakpoint' didn't come to mind
(2) I'm used to consulting documentation rather than source code in the
first instance
(3) I've never worked in Turing tarpits before
(4) Grepping 'breakpoint' as suggested doesn't turn up anything obvious in
any case -- about 100 instances any of which could be a lead.

I'm getting the impression that there's no real-world distinction between
ConTeXt users and ConTeXt developers.


James

On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:44 PM, luigi scarso <luigi.scarso@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:41 PM, James Fisher <jameshfisher@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Certainly works -- thanks Wolfgang.
> >
> > Stymies me how people on this mailing list know this stuff -- even a
> Google
> > search for "setbreakpoints", assuming I knew the command in advance,
> returns
> > nada.
> So why don't you grep in base/* ?
>
> --
> luigi
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
> the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
>