* integral symbol
@ 2016-12-28 10:39 Fabrice Couvreur
2016-12-28 11:19 ` Henri Menke
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Fabrice Couvreur @ 2016-12-28 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 700 bytes --]
Hello,
The integral symbol is little in inline math mode. Is it possible to have
it bigger ?
thank you,
Fabrice
\definetypeface [mainface] [rm]
[serif] [palatino] [default] [encoding=texnansi]
\definetypeface [mainface] [ss]
[sans] [helvetica] [default] [encoding=texnansi]
\definetypeface [mainface] [tt]
[mono] [palatino] [default] [encoding=texnansi]
\definetypeface [mainface] [mm]
[math] [palatino] [default] [encoding=texnansi]
\setupbodyfont[mainface,11pt]
\starttext
L'aire hachurée se note \math{\int_1^3 k(x)\mathop{dx}}.
L'aire hachurée se note :
\startformula
\int_1^3 k(x)\mathop{dx}.
\stopformula
\stoptext
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1022 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 492 bytes --]
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: integral symbol 2016-12-28 10:39 integral symbol Fabrice Couvreur @ 2016-12-28 11:19 ` Henri Menke 2016-12-28 13:02 ` Fabrice Couvreur 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Henri Menke @ 2016-12-28 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users On 12/28/2016 11:39 AM, Fabrice Couvreur wrote: > Hello, > The integral symbol is little in inline math mode. Is it possible to have it bigger ? > thank you, > Fabrice > > \definetypeface [mainface] [rm] > [serif] [palatino] [default] [encoding=texnansi] > > \definetypeface [mainface] [ss] > [sans] [helvetica] [default] [encoding=texnansi] > > \definetypeface [mainface] [tt] > [mono] [palatino] [default] [encoding=texnansi] > > \definetypeface [mainface] [mm] > [math] [palatino] [default] [encoding=texnansi] > > \setupbodyfont[mainface,11pt] > > \starttext > > L'aire hachurée se note \math{\int_1^3 k(x)\mathop{dx}}. \math{\displaystyle\int_1^3 k(x)\diff x} > > L'aire hachurée se note : > > \startformula > \int_1^3 k(x)\mathop{dx}. > \stopformula > > \stoptext > > > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net > archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: integral symbol 2016-12-28 11:19 ` Henri Menke @ 2016-12-28 13:02 ` Fabrice Couvreur 2016-12-28 16:42 ` Hans Hagen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Fabrice Couvreur @ 2016-12-28 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2129 bytes --] Hi Henri, Thank you for your suggestion. Fabrice 2016-12-28 12:19 GMT+01:00 Henri Menke <henrimenke@gmail.com>: > On 12/28/2016 11:39 AM, Fabrice Couvreur wrote: > > Hello, > > The integral symbol is little in inline math mode. Is it possible to > have it bigger ? > > thank you, > > Fabrice > > > > \definetypeface [mainface] [rm] > > [serif] [palatino] [default] [encoding=texnansi] > > > > \definetypeface [mainface] [ss] > > [sans] [helvetica] [default] [encoding=texnansi] > > > > \definetypeface [mainface] [tt] > > [mono] [palatino] [default] [encoding=texnansi] > > > > \definetypeface [mainface] [mm] > > [math] [palatino] [default] [encoding=texnansi] > > > > \setupbodyfont[mainface,11pt] > > > > \starttext > > > > L'aire hachurée se note \math{\int_1^3 k(x)\mathop{dx}}. > > \math{\displaystyle\int_1^3 k(x)\diff x} > > > > > L'aire hachurée se note : > > > > \startformula > > \int_1^3 k(x)\mathop{dx}. > > \stopformula > > > > \stoptext > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > _______________________ > > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry > to the Wiki! > > > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/ > listinfo/ntg-context > > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net > > archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ > > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > > ____________________________________________________________ > _______________________ > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > _______________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to > the Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/ > listinfo/ntg-context > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net > archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > ____________________________________________________________ > _______________________ [-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3878 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 492 bytes --] ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: integral symbol 2016-12-28 13:02 ` Fabrice Couvreur @ 2016-12-28 16:42 ` Hans Hagen 2016-12-28 17:14 ` Alan Braslau 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Hans Hagen @ 2016-12-28 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ntg-context On 12/28/2016 2:02 PM, Fabrice Couvreur wrote: > Hi Henri, > Thank you for your suggestion. The problem with integrals is that they don't adapt because they are not wrapped as delimiters (like left/right stuff). If \int were a command taking an argument it would be easier. As in: \starttext \setupmathextensible[integral][rightoffset=-3mu,exact=yes,factor=2] \startlines \ruledhbox{$\integral f\frac{1}{2}$} \ruledhbox{$\integral[factor=1] f\frac{1}{2}$} \ruledhbox{$\integral[factor=3] f\frac{1}{2}$} \stoplines \startformula a = \autointegral{t}{b}1 + \autointegral{t}{b}{\frac{\frac{3}{4}}{\frac{1}{2}}} + \autointegral{t}{b}{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{1}{2}}{2}}{2}}{2}} \stopformula \stoptext > Fabrice > > 2016-12-28 12:19 GMT+01:00 Henri Menke <henrimenke@gmail.com > <mailto:henrimenke@gmail.com>>: > > On 12/28/2016 11:39 AM, Fabrice Couvreur wrote: > > Hello, > > The integral symbol is little in inline math mode. Is it possible to have it bigger ? > > thank you, > > Fabrice > > > > \definetypeface [mainface] [rm] > > [serif] [palatino] [default] [encoding=texnansi] > > > > \definetypeface [mainface] [ss] > > [sans] [helvetica] [default] [encoding=texnansi] > > > > \definetypeface [mainface] [tt] > > [mono] [palatino] [default] [encoding=texnansi] > > > > \definetypeface [mainface] [mm] > > [math] [palatino] [default] [encoding=texnansi] > > > > \setupbodyfont[mainface,11pt] > > > > \starttext > > > > L'aire hachurée se note \math{\int_1^3 k(x)\mathop{dx}}. > > \math{\displaystyle\int_1^3 k(x)\diff x} > > > > > L'aire hachurée se note : > > > > \startformula > > \int_1^3 k(x)\mathop{dx}. > > \stopformula > > > > \stoptext > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an > entry to the Wiki! > > > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl <mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl> / > http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > <http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context> > > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net > > archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ > <https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/> > > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > > > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an > entry to the Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl <mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl> / > http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > <http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context> > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net > archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ > <https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/> > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net > archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: integral symbol 2016-12-28 16:42 ` Hans Hagen @ 2016-12-28 17:14 ` Alan Braslau 2016-12-28 17:40 ` Hans Hagen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Alan Braslau @ 2016-12-28 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hans Hagen; +Cc: mailing list for ConTeXt users Hi Hans, Hi list, This is similar to what we have discussed earlier on this list and elsewhere regarding \over vs. \frac. (I agree with Knuth that {a \over b} is *much* more readable in running source code than \frac{a}{b} but have resigned myself to use \frac{}{}, as this can be made better behaved and gives a much better result.) Other traditional TeX constructs like \int^a_b have their charm (and need to remain supported, just like is \over), but I support introducing and encouraging the use of new constructs like your example below. An alternative syntax (that could co-exist) would be admitting $\left\int ... \right.$, but I do not know what limitations there might be with both the (luatex) engine and with ConTeXt. The problem with extensions, like always, in straying from traditional TeX is interchangeability of code, or, more importantly, in the learning curve obstacles that this introduces to traditional TeX (and LaTeX) thinking. I know that at some level we do not care, for we often make (good) design choices that improve the syntax of ConTeXt. Perhaps we can use this thread to discuss other cases (like \sum, ...) that present difficulties and then decide on good solutions. Just a suggestion. Alan On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 17:42:39 +0100 Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl> wrote: > The problem with integrals is that they don't adapt because they are > not wrapped as delimiters (like left/right stuff). If \int were a > command taking an argument it would be easier. As in: > > > \starttext > > \setupmathextensible[integral][rightoffset=-3mu,exact=yes,factor=2] > > \startlines > \ruledhbox{$\integral f\frac{1}{2}$} > \ruledhbox{$\integral[factor=1] f\frac{1}{2}$} > \ruledhbox{$\integral[factor=3] f\frac{1}{2}$} > \stoplines > > \startformula > a = > \autointegral{t}{b}1 + > \autointegral{t}{b}{\frac{\frac{3}{4}}{\frac{1}{2}}} + > \autointegral{t}{b}{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{1}{2}}{2}}{2}}{2}} > \stopformula > > \stoptext -- Alan Braslau CEA DSM-IRAMIS-SPEC CNRS UMR 3680 Orme des Merisiers 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex FRANCE tel: +33 1 69 08 73 15 fax: +33 1 69 08 87 86 mailto:alan.braslau@cea.fr ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: integral symbol 2016-12-28 17:14 ` Alan Braslau @ 2016-12-28 17:40 ` Hans Hagen 2016-12-29 11:12 ` Fabrice Couvreur 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Hans Hagen @ 2016-12-28 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alan Braslau; +Cc: mailing list for ConTeXt users On 12/28/2016 6:14 PM, Alan Braslau wrote: > Hi Hans, Hi list, > > This is similar to what we have discussed earlier on this list and > elsewhere regarding \over vs. \frac. (I agree with Knuth that {a \over > b} is *much* more readable in running source code than \frac{a}{b} but > have resigned myself to use \frac{}{}, as this can be made better > behaved and gives a much better result.) > > Other traditional TeX constructs like \int^a_b have their charm (and > need to remain supported, just like is \over), but I support > introducing and encouraging the use of new constructs like your example > below. An alternative syntax (that could co-exist) would be admitting > $\left\int ... \right.$, but I do not know what limitations there might > be with both the (luatex) engine and with ConTeXt. the tricky part there is that int has super and subscripts while left / right are different animals ... i looked into this (in the engine) and decided to delay implementing that (i might do it some day but it's sort of tricky to keep compatibility) also, ints are upright (extensible or stepwise sizes) or slanted (stepwise sizes) so even if we support something there are some limitations due to lack of font support (could be dealt with in due time) > The problem with extensions, like always, in straying from traditional > TeX is interchangeability of code, or, more importantly, in the > learning curve obstacles that this introduces to traditional TeX (and > LaTeX) thinking. I know that at some level we do not care, for we often > make (good) design choices that improve the syntax of ConTeXt. > > Perhaps we can use this thread to discuss other cases (like \sum, ...) > that present difficulties and then decide on good solutions. sure ... Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: integral symbol 2016-12-28 17:40 ` Hans Hagen @ 2016-12-29 11:12 ` Fabrice Couvreur 2016-12-29 12:06 ` Hans Hagen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Fabrice Couvreur @ 2016-12-29 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2982 bytes --] Hi Hans, Thanks for your solution. I created a macro, is it "robust" ? Fabrice \setupmathextensible[integral][rightoffset=-3mu,exact=yes,factor=2] \def\integ#1#2#3{\math{\autointegral{#1}{#2}{#3}\diff x}} \starttext \integ{4}{1}{g(x)} \stoptext 2016-12-28 18:40 GMT+01:00 Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>: > On 12/28/2016 6:14 PM, Alan Braslau wrote: > >> Hi Hans, Hi list, >> >> This is similar to what we have discussed earlier on this list and >> elsewhere regarding \over vs. \frac. (I agree with Knuth that {a \over >> b} is *much* more readable in running source code than \frac{a}{b} but >> have resigned myself to use \frac{}{}, as this can be made better >> behaved and gives a much better result.) >> >> Other traditional TeX constructs like \int^a_b have their charm (and >> need to remain supported, just like is \over), but I support >> introducing and encouraging the use of new constructs like your example >> below. An alternative syntax (that could co-exist) would be admitting >> $\left\int ... \right.$, but I do not know what limitations there might >> be with both the (luatex) engine and with ConTeXt. >> > > the tricky part there is that int has super and subscripts while left / > right are different animals ... i looked into this (in the engine) and > decided to delay implementing that (i might do it some day but it's sort of > tricky to keep compatibility) > > also, ints are upright (extensible or stepwise sizes) or slanted (stepwise > sizes) so even if we support something there are some limitations due to > lack of font support (could be dealt with in due time) > > The problem with extensions, like always, in straying from traditional >> TeX is interchangeability of code, or, more importantly, in the >> learning curve obstacles that this introduces to traditional TeX (and >> LaTeX) thinking. I know that at some level we do not care, for we often >> make (good) design choices that improve the syntax of ConTeXt. >> >> Perhaps we can use this thread to discuss other cases (like \sum, ...) >> that present difficulties and then decide on good solutions. >> > > sure ... > > Hans > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE > Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands > tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > ____________________________________________________________ > _______________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to > the Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/list > info/ntg-context > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net > archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > ____________________________________________________________ > _______________________ > [-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 5310 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 492 bytes --] ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: integral symbol 2016-12-29 11:12 ` Fabrice Couvreur @ 2016-12-29 12:06 ` Hans Hagen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Hans Hagen @ 2016-12-29 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ntg-context On 12/29/2016 12:12 PM, Fabrice Couvreur wrote: > Hi Hans, > Thanks for your solution. I created a macro, is it "robust" ? > Fabrice > > \setupmathextensible[integral][rightoffset=-3mu,exact=yes,factor=2] \unexpanded > \def\integ#1#2#3{\math{\autointegral{#1}{#2}{#3}\diff x}} > > \starttext > \integ{4}{1}{g(x)} > \stoptext > > > 2016-12-28 18:40 GMT+01:00 Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl > <mailto:pragma@wxs.nl>>: > > On 12/28/2016 6:14 PM, Alan Braslau wrote: > > Hi Hans, Hi list, > > This is similar to what we have discussed earlier on this list and > elsewhere regarding \over vs. \frac. (I agree with Knuth that {a > \over > b} is *much* more readable in running source code than > \frac{a}{b} but > have resigned myself to use \frac{}{}, as this can be made better > behaved and gives a much better result.) > > Other traditional TeX constructs like \int^a_b have their charm (and > need to remain supported, just like is \over), but I support > introducing and encouraging the use of new constructs like your > example > below. An alternative syntax (that could co-exist) would be > admitting > $\left\int ... \right.$, but I do not know what limitations > there might > be with both the (luatex) engine and with ConTeXt. > > > the tricky part there is that int has super and subscripts while > left / right are different animals ... i looked into this (in the > engine) and decided to delay implementing that (i might do it some > day but it's sort of tricky to keep compatibility) > > also, ints are upright (extensible or stepwise sizes) or slanted > (stepwise sizes) so even if we support something there are some > limitations due to lack of font support (could be dealt with in due > time) > > The problem with extensions, like always, in straying from > traditional > TeX is interchangeability of code, or, more importantly, in the > learning curve obstacles that this introduces to traditional TeX > (and > LaTeX) thinking. I know that at some level we do not care, for > we often > make (good) design choices that improve the syntax of ConTeXt. > > Perhaps we can use this thread to discuss other cases (like > \sum, ...) > that present difficulties and then decide on good solutions. > > > sure ... > > Hans > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE > Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands > tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl > <http://www.pragma-ade.nl> | www.pragma-pod.nl > <http://www.pragma-pod.nl> > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an > entry to the Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl <mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl> / > http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > <http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context> > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net > archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ > <https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/> > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net > archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-12-29 12:06 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2016-12-28 10:39 integral symbol Fabrice Couvreur 2016-12-28 11:19 ` Henri Menke 2016-12-28 13:02 ` Fabrice Couvreur 2016-12-28 16:42 ` Hans Hagen 2016-12-28 17:14 ` Alan Braslau 2016-12-28 17:40 ` Hans Hagen 2016-12-29 11:12 ` Fabrice Couvreur 2016-12-29 12:06 ` Hans Hagen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).