From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/86225 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Jan Tosovsky" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: [***SPAM***] RE: Footnote line position Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 12:22:55 +0100 Message-ID: <8335.78422102637$1391858596@news.gmane.org> References: <010801cee7c1$2f23e8f0$8d6bbad0$@tosovsky@email.cz> <000c01ceee85$9b6399a0$d22acce0$@tosovsky@email.cz> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391858583 27975 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2014 11:23:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 11:23:03 +0000 (UTC) To: "'mailing list for ConTeXt users'" Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sat Feb 08 12:23:12 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([5.39.185.229]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WC607-0007Mx-Rx for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 12:23:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1043E101FB; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 12:23:11 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id en6vabtlDnfn; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 12:23:08 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE54C101F5; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 12:23:07 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35911101F2 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 12:23:06 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id yO+nXM+i29aY for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 12:23:05 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from filter4-ams.mf.surf.net (filter4-ams.mf.surf.net [192.87.102.72]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 749A2101E1 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 12:23:05 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from fep14.mx.upcmail.net (fep14.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.34]) by filter4-ams.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id s18Bav9a029074 for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 12:37:07 +0100 Original-Received: from edge03.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.238]) by viefep14-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.05.05 201-2260-151-110-20120111) with ESMTP id <20140208112254.RVDF13149.viefep14-int.chello.at@edge03.upcmail.net> for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 12:22:54 +0100 Original-Received: from emk ([78.102.140.160]) by edge03.upcmail.net with edge id PnNu1n00L3Tq9wW03nNuV3; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 12:22:54 +0100 X-SourceIP: 78.102.140.160 In-Reply-To: <000c01ceee85$9b6399a0$d22acce0$@tosovsky@email.cz> X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Content-Language: cs Thread-Index: Ac7nwKyB5Qx81HtFQN6uSvwuH2WvJAGv+cQwDY+sboA= X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: ntg-context@ntg.nl, base:default, @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=62.179.121.34; country=AT; latitude=47.3333; longitude=13.3333; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=47.3333,13.3333&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 01LnLAVDN - d11b83a56f5f - 20140208 (trained as not-spam) X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 192.87.102.72 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:86225 Archived-At: On 2013-12-01 Jan Tosovsky wrote: > On 2013-11-22 Jan Tosovsky wrote: > > > > when a single line footnote is used, the footnote divider is > > rendered in larger distance than for footnotes with two or > > more lines (I mean a gap between the line and the footnote text). > > > > It can be tested easily: > > > > \chapter{Chapter}Foo\footnote{Bar}. > > \chapter{Chapter}Foo\footnote{Bar > > > > Bar}. > > > > This behaviour seems to be driven by this code in strc-not.mkvi: > > \unexpanded\def\normalnoterule > {\ifvmode > \dontleavehmode \blackrule > [\c!color=\noteparameter\c!rulecolor, > \c!width=.2\hsize, > \c!height=\noteparameter\c!rulethickness, > \c!depth=\zeropoint]% > \endgraf > \kern\strutdepth > \fi} > > When e.g. \endgraf or \kern\strutdepth lines are commented, the gap is > smaller, but still different. > > Changing the depth from \zeropoint to a bigger value (1cm) makes the > gap same, but it leads to extreme thick rule. > After couple of weeks I've updated my Beta and I cannot reproduce the original behaviour any more! Thanks for fixing, Jan ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________