From: Hans Hagen via ntg-context <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Cc: Hans Hagen <j.hagen@xs4all.nl>, Otared Kavian <otared@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: OT world history: other measuring systems?
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 09:58:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8385e759-c74c-82e9-b0cc-775d17fdede8@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A93C26B0-D872-4D40-9891-B7E59CDBF0BC@gmail.com>
On 1/26/2022 9:41 AM, Otared Kavian via ntg-context wrote:
>
>> On 26 Jan 2022, at 00:17, Hans Hagen via ntg-context <ntg-context@ntg.nl> wrote:
>> […]
>> times (clocks) were definitely different per city
>
> Regarding the issue of the absolute necessity of defining a standard time the book by Peter Galison « Einstein’s Clocks, Poincaré’s Maps » gives some interesting insight. In particular, since after the mid 19th century trains were developed while the time was not standardized, many accidents happened with hundreds of people killed. This led Henri Poincaré, Lorentz and Einstein (among other mathematcians and physicists) to th enotion of relativity…
Talking time,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_calendar
is a good example of a failure to replace thousands of years of reality.
So, maybe some measures (feet etc) will stay with us forever.
(I need to look up how these old cultured talked 'temperature'.)
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-26 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-25 9:44 Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context
2022-01-25 17:27 ` Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context
2022-01-25 17:45 ` Hans Hagen via ntg-context
2022-01-25 19:41 ` Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context
2022-01-25 23:20 ` Hans Hagen via ntg-context
2022-01-25 19:28 ` Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context
2022-01-25 20:31 ` Jean-Pierre Delange via ntg-context
2022-01-25 23:17 ` Hans Hagen via ntg-context
2022-01-26 8:41 ` Otared Kavian via ntg-context
2022-01-26 8:58 ` Hans Hagen via ntg-context [this message]
2022-01-26 9:23 ` Jean-Pierre Delange via ntg-context
2022-01-26 9:36 ` Hans Hagen via ntg-context
2022-01-26 21:07 ` jbf via ntg-context
2022-01-26 21:43 ` Hans Hagen via ntg-context
2022-01-27 7:23 ` BPJ via ntg-context
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8385e759-c74c-82e9-b0cc-775d17fdede8@xs4all.nl \
--to=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
--cc=j.hagen@xs4all.nl \
--cc=otared@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).