From: Jorge Manuel <desdechaves@gmail.com>
To: ntg-context mailing list <ntg-context@ntg.nl>,
mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>,
Bruce Horrocks <ntg@scorecrow.com>
Subject: [NTG-context] Re: Seeking Advice on Electron Configuration Notation in ConTeXt
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 15:25:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <845e8aa0-0539-4496-858c-3611f202e068@Spark> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20C977DD-E38E-483E-A522-7F0C1CA706FF@scorecrow.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 561 bytes --]
Bruce is correct. In half-filled orbitals (with only one electron), electrons with spin "up" should be positioned on the left, while those with spin "down" should be placed on the right.
Jorge
On 31 Oct 2024, 11:35 +0000, mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>, wrote:
>
> Another detail - probably needs input from Jorge - at the moment if there is a single electron, the arrow is centred in the box. Would it help to have an option that up arrows align left and down arrows align right so that there is a space where the missing arrow would go?
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1188 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 511 bytes --]
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror)
archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-31 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5e4e292b-6d11-4b37-b00d-2e1aefdfe4b6@Spark>
2024-10-29 22:33 ` [NTG-context] " Jorge Manuel
2024-10-29 23:22 ` [NTG-context] " Hans Hagen
2024-10-30 0:21 ` Bruce Horrocks
2024-10-30 10:14 ` Hans Hagen
2024-10-30 10:25 ` Hans Hagen
2024-10-30 20:35 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2024-10-30 20:41 ` Hans Hagen
2024-10-30 21:07 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2024-10-30 21:45 ` Hans Hagen
2024-10-31 11:34 ` Bruce Horrocks
2024-10-31 12:13 ` Hans Hagen via ntg-context
2024-10-31 15:25 ` Jorge Manuel [this message]
2024-10-31 15:28 ` Hans Hagen via ntg-context
2024-10-31 15:47 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2024-10-31 16:39 ` vm via ntg-context
2024-10-31 17:02 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2024-10-31 17:38 ` vm via ntg-context
2024-10-31 18:01 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=845e8aa0-0539-4496-858c-3611f202e068@Spark \
--to=desdechaves@gmail.com \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
--cc=ntg@scorecrow.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).