ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Rodriguez <oinos@gmx.es>
To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
Subject: Re: XML in latest betas (MkIV & LMTX)
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2019 15:07:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86cc66e4-fcf6-c112-9c70-b1eafbdf8ca4@gmx.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66e7a65e-2772-a1e1-8e84-9c6c61ba69e7@xs4all.nl>

On 6/2/19 2:12 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 6/2/2019 1:17 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> [...]
>> Compiling exactly the same XML sources (a book on ConTeXt in Spanish),
>> MkIV needs 40s and LMTX more than 52s.
>
> Hm. Is that the first time you compare a MKIV runs with an LMTX run for
> that document? I assume that you time multiple runs.

No, it isn’t the first time I compare and I time multiple runs.

>> This is the first time I get such a difference in compilation times.
>
> On the average LMTX should be faster than MKIV (and definitely not 20%
> slower). I assume it's regular luatex?

Sorry, this was my fault. I thought I was running luatex and it was
luajittex.

MkIV times with luatex are 51.x seconds, which is a tiny bit faster than
LMTX (52.x seconds). But this is perfectly normal.

>> I’m afraid I can’t be sure that output is the same, since different
>> spacing gives different page numbers.
>
> Not sure where that comes from. There are no fundamental changes wrr
> spacing.

Font expansion (as reported in
https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2019/095175.html).

>> I wonder whether this might be an issue.
> Hard to say without a MWE that exposes the same

Sorry for the noise,

Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-02 13:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-02 11:17 Pablo Rodriguez
2019-06-02 12:12 ` Hans Hagen
2019-06-02 13:07   ` Pablo Rodriguez [this message]
2019-06-02 15:18     ` Hans Hagen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86cc66e4-fcf6-c112-9c70-b1eafbdf8ca4@gmx.es \
    --to=oinos@gmx.es \
    --cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).