From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/16401 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: SebastianSturm@t-online.de (Sebastian Sturm) Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Another question regarding Fourier Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 17:18:39 +0200 Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Message-ID: <873FCCD6-0273-11D9-BC37-0003939959D2@t-online.de> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1094743132 1292 80.91.224.253 (9 Sep 2004 15:18:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 15:18:52 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Thu Sep 09 17:18:41 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C5Qh7-0003T3-00 for ; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 17:18:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76C71278D; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 17:18:39 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 31241-06; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 17:18:37 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D05F12780; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 17:18:37 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F34712780 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 17:18:35 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 31270-06 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 17:18:34 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mailout11.sul.t-online.com (unknown [194.25.134.85]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBD112777 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 17:18:34 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from fwd05.aul.t-online.de by mailout11.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1C5Qh0-0006cy-04; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 17:18:34 +0200 Original-Received: from [80.145.25.217] (rxLwPsZ6geHjs+6I2LSRr7xKILubAkZaWjfW9WYEb1kDsndwjCHzcw@[80.145.25.217]) by fwd05.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1C5Qgs-0pCwgS0; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 17:18:26 +0200 Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-ID: rxLwPsZ6geHjs+6I2LSRr7xKILubAkZaWjfW9WYEb1kDsndwjCHzcw X-TOI-MSGID: 597c3570-36ed-4535-bffe-bab54f4c0cfd X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:16401 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:16401 Hi, I noticed that \rightrightarrows still produces the CM double arrows when using the Fourier fonts. I know that it is possible to combine two single arrows and position them vertically using \raise and \lower, but I guess that there has to be some less clumsy solution. Or maybe the Fourier distribution is already supposed to include double arrows, in which case it would be a configuration issue? Best regards, Sebastian Sturm