From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/10747 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Berend de Boer Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Getting the PDF postscript fonts to work Date: 05 Feb 2003 06:41:49 +1300 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: <874r7k7xk2.fsf@dellius.nederware.nl> References: <5.1.0.14.1.20030204132507.03408190@server-1> Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1044380453 24383 80.91.224.249 (4 Feb 2003 17:40:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 17:40:53 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18g73z-0006L6-00 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 18:40:51 +0100 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF8310B37; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 18:42:48 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from dellius.nederware.nl (210-86-50-44.jetstart.xtra.co.nz [210.86.50.44]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6595E10B35 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 18:41:53 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: (from berend@localhost) by dellius.nederware.nl (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h14Hfph13950; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 06:41:51 +1300 X-Authentication-Warning: dellius.nederware.nl: berend set sender to berend@pobox.com using -f Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Home-Page: http://www.pobox.com/~berend In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.1.20030204132507.03408190@server-1> Original-Lines: 25 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:10747 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:10747 Hans Hagen writes: > >1. After tinkering I could get the URW stuff working, but I want the > > Adobe. > > the problem is that those fonts are no longer distributed, as well as > that the glyohs widths differ per location So the URW fonts are better? > in principle it's just a matter of mapping the right names onto Serif > etc, once you know what the filenames are (maybe in some psfonts.map > file you can deduce the raw names) I thought I got them. pdftex is no longer including them, or list them as included. However, in Adobe Acrobat Reader, when I look at the included fonts, the names look like Microsoft TTF names. That it all was a principle of mapping I got :-) Now the correct mapping... -- Live long and prosper, Berend de Boer