From: Sanjoy Mahajan <sanjoy@olin.edu>
To: Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>, <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: underbraces slightly too narrow (with MkIV 2013.05.28)
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 15:15:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878utci14q.fsf@approx.mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51DEA9B9.7050305@wxs.nl>
Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl> writes:
> anyhow, i've now defined then in a different way (ok, some more trickery
> had to be applied as it's one of these aspects of open type math that
> still inherits old stuff) so in a next version you can do this:
>
> \setupmathstackers[vfenced][hoffset=10pt]
Tested with 2014.02.14 beta, and it is a big improvement. Again, sorry
it took so long to test.
If I use hoffset=3pt, it seems that some underbraces get 3-pt borders
but others don't. For example,
\setupmathstackers[vfenced][hoffset=3pt]
\starttext
\placeformula\startformula
\underbrace{15\,\tf cm}_{L}
\times
\underbrace{15}_{L}
\stopformula
\stoptext
The second underbrace has the 3-pt borders, but the first one looks more
like a 0-pt border (though hoffset=0pt makes it have a negative border).
Is it due to quantization, in that the extensibles grow in fixed-size
units?
-Sanjoy
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-15 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-10 12:02 Sanjoy Mahajan
2013-07-10 12:13 ` Marco Patzer
2013-07-10 13:53 ` Rudolf Bahr
2013-07-11 12:48 ` Hans Hagen
2013-07-12 14:28 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2014-02-15 20:15 ` Sanjoy Mahajan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878utci14q.fsf@approx.mit.edu \
--to=sanjoy@olin.edu \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
--cc=pragma@wxs.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).