From: Patrick Gundlach <pg@levana.de>
Subject: Re: Learning ConTeXt: \setupitemize
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 22:58:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87adg1bm5s.fsf@gundla.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <004a01c2e808$ece97360$6e142044@levtwn01.pa.comcast.net> (Gary Pajer's message of "Tue, 11 Mar 2003 15:00:54 -0500")
Gary Pajer <pajer@iname.com> writes:
Hello Gary,
> (If the answers to my question are in some doc somewhere, please tell me
> where it is!)
The answers to your questions are in the context's source code ;-)
> Consider the file below. I expected to see a hairline above the second
> itemization, and indeed I do. But if I remove the "columns" specifier, the
> hairline does not appear. Is this the correct behavior, or a bug?
I'd consider this a bug. A while ago I had the same problem with after=...
[ But, when looking at the source, I wonder why the
\complexdoitemgroupitem ignores \itemlevel\c!voor ]
> Also: what does the keyword "beforehead" do? If I replace "before" with
> "beforehead" in the example, I get nothing. Is it in the docs somewhere?
The beforehead has to do with the \head command also described in the
manual (cont-eni.pdf, cont-enp.pdf).
[...]
\setupitemize[1][][beforehead=\hairline,afterhead=\hairline]
\starttext
\startitemize
\head Level One
[...]
gives
--------------
* Level One
--------------
It is not documented as far as I know.
> In the lists of keywords for many commands there are parameters listed that
> I can't figure out. Some of them seem to do nothing, but I always wonder if
> they only operate in conjunction with some other feature, or I haven't
> implemented them correctly.
One never knows... I have the same problem here.
> Some of them do something, but I can't figure out what the rule
> is. Is there a doc somewhere describing the keywords? Is it in the
> manual and I've missed it?
No. There is documentation on special topics, such as tables or
flowchart module. But for the itemize there is afaik only the main
manual.
Patrick
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-11 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-11 20:00 Gary Pajer
2003-03-11 21:58 ` Patrick Gundlach [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87adg1bm5s.fsf@gundla.ch \
--to=pg@levana.de \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).