From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/5804 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Berend de Boer Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Subtle problem nested XML Date: 09 Oct 2001 11:51:09 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <87g08tta42.fsf@dellius.nederware.nl> References: <5.1.0.14.1.20011008094511.0333e9b8@server-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20011008094511.0333e9b8@server-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20011009093211.0268a710@server-1> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035396371 4716 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:06:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ConTeXt mailinglist Original-To: Hans Hagen In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.1.20011009093211.0268a710@server-1> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:5804 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:5804 Hans Hagen writes: > >Hmm, XML schema's are way to difficult. Have you looked at RELAX NG? > > > > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/relax-ng/ > > btw, for document definintions, i can imagine far more simple > schema's, but i don't want to come up with yet another schema language > -) True of course. For books DTDs are fine. But XML is used more and more to exchange data. In such cases you want typing, subtyping, data typing, and all those checks. That makes things a lot harder. For documents there is probably not much gained by having an XML Schema or RELAX NG definition. -- Groetjes, Berend. (-: