From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/18719 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Angus Lees Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Re: TeX run : 8 Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 08:54:19 +1100 Message-ID: <87hdjs2y5w.wl%gus@inodes.org> References: <422649DF.5050702@wxs.nl> <4226FC16.30104@wxs.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1110017978 31458 80.91.229.2 (5 Mar 2005 10:19:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 10:19:38 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sat Mar 05 11:19:38 2005 Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D7WNh-000649-Cw for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 11:19:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309FD1281C; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 11:24:50 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 03467-02; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 11:24:50 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C16A12840; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 11:23:04 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5EF612840 for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 11:23:02 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 03467-01 for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 11:23:01 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from dolly.pasture.com.au (242.70.233.220.exetel.com.au [220.233.70.242]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76CA71282F for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 11:23:01 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from amavis by dolly.pasture.com.au with no-scan (Exim 4.34) id 1D7WQw-00023i-2k for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 21:22:54 +1100 Original-Received: from [fec0::20f:1fff:feb0:1c9d] (helo=localhost.localdomain.inodes.org) by dolly.pasture.com.au with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D7WQr-00023c-GA for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 21:22:49 +1100 Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: <4226FC16.30104@wxs.nl> Mail-Followup-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.12.0 (Your Wildest Dreams-pre) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp) X-Antipastobozoticataclysm: Bariumenemanilow X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-MailScanner-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-MailScanner-To: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:18719 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:18719 At Thu, 03 Mar 2005 12:59:18 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote: > [if it's indeed the perl hash, (maybe i should make it an array), then > it looks like perl uses a different hash strategy each run and on each > os] Indeed, perl 5.8.1 introduced randomised hash functions to avoid the "hash collision" attacks that were being published at the time. You can never assume hash traversal order will be constant across different hashes. See the discussion in the beginning of `perldoc perl581delta' (and a followup in perl582delta). -- - Gus