From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/2321 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Slawek Zak Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: A proposal for texexec Date: 19 Jun 2000 19:31:49 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <87hfap37cq.fsf@localhost.localnet> References: <00fc01bfd5ec$fc800630$0321a8c0@bmach.nederware.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035393109 7863 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:11:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:11:49 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl In-Reply-To: "Berend de Boer"'s message of "Wed, 14 Jun 2000 12:40:40 +0200" Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:2321 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:2321 "Berend de Boer" writes: > > I think that it would be trivial to implement (there already is > > --result option for texexec). > > Or fix the viewers :-) They should attempt to open the file for exclusive > use or with deny write or something like that: if not possible the file is > not yet ready. These viewers are too greedy. Well, this is a desired behaviour. When the file is recompiled (newer than the it was) they try to reopen and redisplay it. Good thing. It wouldn't break if the refresh happened only when you make the viewer redisplay it's window :) -- Violators can be fined, arrested or jailed for making ugly faces at a dog. [real standing law in Oklahoma, United States of America] Suavek Zak / PGP: finger://zaks@prioris.mini.pw.edu.pl