ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "N. Raghavendra" <nyraghu27132@gmail.com>
To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
Subject: Difficulties with learning about ConTeXt
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 16:10:14 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87inf66tbl.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)

I am a mathematician, and have been using LaTeX on a daily basis since
1992, when I was a graduate student.  I have recently started using
ConTeXt, and am very happy with the facilities it provides, and with its
self-contained system which does not require one to load external
packages with subtle interactions.

One problem that I am facing is that the documentation of ConTeXt is
often not enough for me to figure out what to do when a problem arises.
I understand that documentation is perhaps not a priority for the
project.  As Hans Hagen wrote in `? Context',

  "... writing can get a lower priority in a time when quick and dirty
   answers can be found on the internet, mailing list or wiki.  ... For
   what it's worth: whenever I have to solve a problem with a program
   (or language implementation) I run into cases where I have to look
   long to find (non conflicting) information. It just comes with the
   problems one wants to solve and TeX (ConTeXt) is not different."

However, there is not a great deal of information on the Internet about
solving ConTeXt problems.  Whenever I ran into a LaTeX problem in the
last several years, I used to find a solution, or a substantial step
towards one, that was already documented on the TeX-LaTeX Stack
Exchange.  Unfortunately, it does not contain a similar amount of
information about ConTeXt.  In any case, I have started posting ConTeXt
questions there, see https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/397463/146025 and
https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/397607/146025

As for the mailing list, I posted three requests for help here in the
last one week.  When I bumped my first message after more than a day
without any response, Tomas Hala kindly came to my rescue.  The other
two messages, posted four and two days ago, have not elicited any
response yet.  This contrasts with Aditya Mahajan's experience, which he
describes in his interview at
http://tex-talk.net/2012/08/textalk-an-interview-with-aditya/:

  "Most questions on the context mailing lists are answered within
   minutes ... look in the main manual and the wiki to see how to
   achieve the particular effects that you wanted, and if you cannot
   figure it out, ask on the context mailing list."

I understand that we are all busy, and it is not easy to find time to
answer novice queries on the list.

Lastly, I found the Wiki useful sometimes for quick and dirty solutions
to problems, and sometimes as a source of documentation.  Yet there have
been several cases where I could not find what I wanted in it.

For example, I could not find the answers to my last two queries on this
list and to my two questions on SE, in the manual, on the archives of
this list, or on the Wiki.

These problems mean that I have to spend much more time experimenting
and searching before I find a reasonable way to get the things I want
with ConTeXt.  Given the beauty of the results that ConTeXt returns, I
don't mind that.  However, I wonder if there are others who have similar
problems learning about ConTeXt, and if they have some words of advice
for me.  I am also interested in ways to help people with similar
difficulties.

Regards,
Raghu.

--
N. Raghavendra <raghu@hri.res.in>, http://www.retrotexts.net/
Harish-Chandra Research Institute, http://www.hri.res.in/
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

             reply	other threads:[~2017-10-23 10:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-23 10:40 N. Raghavendra [this message]
2017-10-23 10:59 ` luigi scarso
2017-10-23 11:59   ` N. Raghavendra
2017-10-23 19:49 ` Pablo Rodriguez
2017-10-24 13:34   ` N. Raghavendra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87inf66tbl.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=nyraghu27132@gmail.com \
    --cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).