From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/9645
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Olaf Weber <olaf@infovore.xs4all.nl>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Gamma support in TeXExec?
Date: 24 Oct 2002 18:48:44 +0200
Sender: ntg-context-admin@ref.ntg.nl
Message-ID: <87lm4nn5oz.fsf@infovore.xs4all.nl>
References: <5.1.0.14.1.20021021085206.02ecf2a8@server-1>
	<5.1.0.14.1.20021020184536.00afa6e0@remote-1>
	<5.1.0.14.1.20021020184536.00afa6e0@remote-1>
	<5.1.0.14.1.20021021085206.02ecf2a8@server-1>
	<5.1.0.14.1.20021022101312.02d88548@server-1>
	<10298650241.20021022113335@iol.it>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035478109 1500 80.91.224.249 (24 Oct 2002 16:48:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:48:29 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>, ntg-context@ntg.nl
Return-path: <ntg-context-admin@ref.vet.uu.nl>
Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl)
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 184l9m-0000O0-00
	for <gctc-ntg-context-518@gmane.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 18:48:26 +0200
Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E226D10AE3; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 18:49:29 +0200 (MEST)
Original-Received: from smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl (smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.139])
	by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4143D10AE1
	for <ntg-context@ntg.nl>; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 18:48:36 +0200 (MEST)
Original-Received: from infovore.xs4all.nl (213-84-180-111.adsl.xs4all.nl [213.84.180.111])
	by smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g9OGmS0C073466;
	Thu, 24 Oct 2002 18:48:28 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: from olaf by infovore.xs4all.nl with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 184lA4-0000JH-00; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 18:48:44 +0200
Original-To: Giuseppe Bilotta <gip.bilotta@iol.it>
In-Reply-To: <10298650241.20021022113335@iol.it>
Original-Lines: 26
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Honest Recruiter)
Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ref.ntg.nl
X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:ntg-context-request@ref.ntg.nl?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl>
List-Subscribe: <http://ref.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context>,
	<mailto:ntg-context-request@ref.ntg.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context.ref.ntg.nl>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://ref.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context>,
	<mailto:ntg-context-request@ref.ntg.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ref.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:9645
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:9645

Giuseppe Bilotta writes:

> Tuesday, October 22, 2002 Hans Hagen wrote:

> HH> tex     -> fmt
> HH> etec    -> efmt (already)
> HH> pdftex  -> pft
> HH> pdfetex -> epmt
> HH> omega   -> oft
> HH> eomega  -> eoft
> HH> nts     -> nfmt (already)

> HH> but since pdftex is compatible is less urgent

> since it's efmt and nfmt, wouldn't consistency call for pfmt,
> ofmt, eofmt, pefmt ?

Yes, but thanks to the immense success of 8+3 filenames, they could
end up being truncated to pfm, ofm, eof, pef respectively.  ofm is
known to collide with another suffix.

-- 
Olaf Weber

               (This space left blank for technical reasons.)