ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Albert Krewinkel via ntg-context <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
Cc: Albert Krewinkel <albert+context@zeitkraut.de>
Subject: Improving pandoc's ConTeXt output
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2022 09:07:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o7z7pnrm.fsf@zeitkraut.de> (raw)

Hi all,

I'm currently trying to improve the ConTeXt output generated by pandoc,
the document convert. There are two questions that we haven't decided
on, and I'd be grateful to receive some feedback from ConTeXt experts on
these issues:

1. As far as I understand, the `\section` syntax currently produced by
   pandoc should be considered mkii legacy syntax. We're likely going to
   switch to the modern `\startsection`/`\stopsection` syntax instead.
   Are there any concerns about retiring the old syntax?
   (Side note: pandoc already produces the new syntax, but only when
   called with `--section-divs`.)

2. Similarly, I'd like to start wrapping paragraphs with
   `\startparagraph`/`\stopparagraph`. It is important for me to get
   properly tagged PDF, but this would also make the output more
   verbose. Is that something that you would find bothering, or do you
   see adding the extra environment by default as an acceptable
   practice?

Of course, I'd also be happy to get other suggestions on how to improve
pandoc's ConTeXt support.

Thanks in advance,

Albert


-- 
Albert Krewinkel
GPG: 8eed e3e2 e8c5 6f18 81fe  e836 388d c0b2 1f63 1124
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

             reply	other threads:[~2022-06-05  7:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-05  7:07 Albert Krewinkel via ntg-context [this message]
2022-06-05  8:20 ` juh via ntg-context
2022-06-05  9:39   ` Denis Maier via ntg-context
2022-06-05 14:15   ` Albert Krewinkel via ntg-context
2022-06-05 16:38     ` juh+ntg-context--- via ntg-context
2022-06-05 23:52       ` Thangalin via ntg-context
2022-06-06  5:21         ` Problem with SVG an conversion mp (was: Improving pandoc's ConTeXt output) Jan U. Hasecke via ntg-context
2022-06-06  5:51         ` Improving pandoc's ConTeXt output juh+ntg-context--- via ntg-context
2022-06-05  9:46 ` Denis Maier via ntg-context
2022-06-05 10:01 ` Hans Hagen via ntg-context
2022-06-05 11:08   ` Wolfgang Schuster via ntg-context
2022-06-05 14:30     ` Albert Krewinkel via ntg-context
2022-06-06 20:47       ` Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context
2022-06-08 13:43 ` Albert Krewinkel via ntg-context

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87o7z7pnrm.fsf@zeitkraut.de \
    --to=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
    --cc=albert+context@zeitkraut.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).