From: "Peter Münster" <pmlists@free.fr>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: git or svn
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 16:02:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r4cawef0.fsf@micropit.couberia.selfip.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130927152625.12c967ca@aga-netbook> (Marcin Borkowski's message of "Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:26:25 +0200")
On Fri, Sep 27 2013, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
> However, it seems that nowadays, for a *new* user, learning to use SVN
> is pointless
For our use case (enhancing the documentation) that's a nonissue:
git or svn, there is nothing to learn, just pull, edit, commit.
3 lines on the project web page will show you what to do.
Of course, if you choose a complicated workflow (maintaining several
branches, test and validation cycles, commit signatures, and so on),
then git would be a good choice, and yes, then you'll have to learn it.
But please don't spend more time with the DVCS than with the improvement
of the manual... ;)
--
Peter
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-27 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-18 19:53 ConTeXt Manual Errata Thangalin
2013-09-21 17:15 ` Marco Patzer
2013-09-26 17:44 ` Marco Patzer
2013-09-26 20:07 ` Thangalin
2013-09-26 20:15 ` Aditya Mahajan
2013-09-26 20:31 ` Marco Patzer
2013-09-26 20:42 ` Peter Münster
2013-09-26 21:22 ` Mica Semrick
2013-09-26 21:50 ` git or svn (was: ConTeXt Manual Errata) Peter Münster
2013-09-26 21:56 ` Mica Semrick
2013-09-26 23:24 ` Thangalin
2013-09-27 6:46 ` git or svn Peter Münster
2013-09-27 1:10 ` git or svn (was: ConTeXt Manual Errata) Aditya Mahajan
2013-09-27 7:01 ` git or svn Peter Münster
2013-09-27 7:38 ` Taco Hoekwater
2013-09-27 13:01 ` Lars Huttar
2013-09-27 13:10 ` Lars Huttar
2013-09-27 13:26 ` Marcin Borkowski
2013-09-27 14:02 ` Peter Münster [this message]
2013-09-27 14:27 ` Hans Hagen
2013-09-27 17:08 ` Mica Semrick
2013-09-26 23:22 ` ConTeXt Manual Errata Thangalin
2013-09-27 9:10 ` Marco Patzer
2013-09-27 9:27 ` Peter Münster
2013-09-26 20:17 ` Marco Patzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r4cawef0.fsf@micropit.couberia.selfip.net \
--to=pmlists@free.fr \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).