Re: [Fwd: Bug tracking system for ConTeXt]

[Daniel Pittman <daniel@rimspace.net>]

On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Hans Hagen wrote:
> At 12:07 AM 2/28/2002 +1100, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the explanation!

Is the case of aegis, take it with a bit of a grain of salt. A couple of
people have pointed out to me that I might be less aware of it's
features than I thought.

It's also the one I know the least about so your millage may vary.

>> > - aegis (http://aegis.sourceforge.net/)
>>
>>Unless I am very much mistaken this is a development process tool that
>>works with your choice of revision control system and imposes
>>additional process on it.
>>
>>Last I checked it talked about RCS, CVS and SCCS, but may support
>>more.
>>
>>This may be a solution to problems of greater scope than revision
>>control, which may actually be the problem you are trying to address
>>here, but it's not, in and of itself, a revision control system.
> 
> Does anyone know perforce (commercial)? TeX live is done with it.

I have heard good things about it but only very indirectly. It's
commercial nature made it hard to verify experimentally as we didn't
manage to secure a test license in the period I was looking.

        Daniel

-- 
A cathedral, a wave of a storm, a dancer's leap,
never turn out to be as high as we had hoped.
        -- Marcel Proust