From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/7824 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Patrick Gundlach" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: strange Date: 08 May 2002 10:14:53 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <87sn53dpj6.fsf@gundla.ch> References: <5.1.0.14.1.20020507210713.02cb9c30@server-1> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035398268 22623 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:37:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:37:48 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.1.20020507210713.02cb9c30@server-1> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:7824 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:7824 Hans Hagen writes: Hi, > I maybe wrong but it looks like glyphs have different dimensions in > different encodings: > > \hbox > {\font\test=uplr8t \test \ruledhbox{t} > \font\test=uplr8r \test \ruledhbox{t}} that is what I have found in the tfm files: pplr8r (CHARACTER C t (CHARWD R 0.325989) (CHARHT R 0.638995) (CHARDP R 0.0065) ) pplr8t (CHARACTER C t (CHARWD R 0.325989) (CHARHT R 0.605993) (CHARDP R 0.002996) ) really strange. Patrick -- I'll fade into the darkness